Wolfson v. C. I. R., s. 80-1043

Decision Date24 June 1981
Docket NumberNos. 80-1043,80-1044,s. 80-1043
Citation651 F.2d 1228
Parties81-2 USTC P 9594 William Q. WOLFSON and Elizabeth Wolfson, Petitioners-Appellants, Cross Appellees, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee, Cross-Appellant.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit

Alan Adelson, Southfield, Mich., for petitioners-appellants, cross-appellees.

M. Carr Ferguson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Gilbert E. Andrews, Daniel F. Ross, George L. Hastings, Jr., Tax Division, U. S. Dept. of Justice, N. Jerold Cohen, Chief Counsel, I. R. S., Washington, D. C., for respondent-appellee, cross-appellant.

Before JONES, Circuit Judge, CECIL, Senior Circuit Judge, and BERTELSMAN, District Judge. *

ORDER

William Q. Wolfson appeals from the Tax Court's determination that the payment he received in settlement of his state court action against Wayne State University is includable in gross income because it was intended to compensate him for lost earnings, and was not a nontaxable form of compensation for personal injury to his personal reputation. Wolfson also contests the Tax Court's determination that funds he received while working as a medical resident were gross income paid in return for services he rendered, instead of nontaxable fellowship grants.

In 1943, Wolfson received his medical degree from a medical school which was not fully accredited in all states. He wished to do medical research, and therefore sought to obtain a degree from a "Class A" medical school which was accredited in all states. In 1953, Wayne University Medical College offered Wolfson a chance to earn a medical degree (Class A) and at the same time to act as a member of Wayne State's volunteer faculty. While he served on the faculty he would be enrolled as a medical student. Wolfson took advantage of the opportunity and went to Wayne State.

In 1954, Wolfson was called into active duty as an officer in the Army Reserves. There was a great deal of publicity about his attempts to obtain a deferment, and one of the members of Wayne State's faculty accused Wolfson of exploiting the plight of his patients in order to obtain a deferment.

After Wolfson was inducted into the Army, the faculty and administration at Wayne State denied Wolfson's status as a faculty member while he attended Wayne State. When they responded to inquiries about Wolfson's status while he attended Wayne State they stated that he had not been a faculty member, but merely a student. Wolfson was also unsuccessful in his attempts to have Wayne State's records changed to reflect his true status.

In 1960, Wolfson filed an action against Wayne State and members of Wayne State's administration and faculty. He sought to have Wayne State affirm his true status and he sought damages. The state court entered a judgment for Wolfson which awarded him $175,000.

Wolfson filed an appeal, but before it was heard he settled the case. Wayne State agreed to pay Wolfson $105,000 and correct its records to reflect his status as a research associate.

In 1969 and 1970, Wolfson studied to be a psychiatrist and was a resident at Northville...

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 cases
  • Cal. State Teachers' Ret. Sys. v. Alvarez
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Delaware
    • January 25, 2018
  • Concord Instruments Corporation v. Commissioner
    • United States
    • U.S. Tax Court
    • May 31, 1994
    ...372 U.S. 39 (1963). The proper inquiry is: in lieu of what were the damages paid? Wolfson v. Commissioner [81-2 USTC ¶ 9594], 651 F.2d 1228 (6th Cir. 1981), affg. and remanding [Dec. 35,509(M)] T.C. Memo. 1978-445; Robinson v. Commissioner [Dec. 49,648], 102 T.C. ___ (1994); Yates Indus. In......
  • In re Sonus Networks, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit
    • August 16, 2007
  • Burke v. U.S.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • April 5, 1991
    ...income because it was intended to compensate [Burke] for lost earnings...." Threlkeld, 848 F.2d at 83 (distinguishing Wolfson v. Commissioner, 651 F.2d 1228 (6th Cir.1981)). See also Wolfson (accepting applicability of clear error analysis to Tax Court determinations of excludability in per......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Federal Income Tax Consequences of Settlements and Judgments-part I: Plaintiffs
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Colorado Lawyer No. 15-1, January 1986
    • Invalid date
    ...1985-29 I.R.B. 5. 11. Id. 12. See, e.g., Glynn v. Commissioner, 76 T.C. 116 (1981) and Wolfson v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 1978-445, aff'd 651 F.2d 1228 (6th Cir. 1981). 13. Roemer v. Commissioner, 716 F.2d 693 (9th Cir. 1983) and Church v. Commissioner, 80 T.C. 1104 (1983). 14. Roemer, supr......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT