Wolkewitz v. Wood
| Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
| Writing for the Court | Hall |
| Citation | Wolkewitz v. Wood, 216 S.W.2d 611 (Tex. App. 1948) |
| Decision Date | 07 October 1948 |
| Docket Number | No. 6389.,6389. |
| Petition History | writ ref'd n.r.e. |
| Parties | WOLKEWITZ et al. v. WOOD et al. |
Appeal from District Court, Smith County; Otis T. Dunagan, Judge.
Action by Mrs. Virgil Wood and others, against Mrs. Malisa Wolkewitz and others, for the construction of a will. Judgment for the plaintiffs, and the defendants appeal.
Judgment affirmed.
Smith & Smith, of Tyler for appellants.
L. L. James, of Tyler, for appellees.
This action was instituted in the District Court of Smith County for the purpose of having the will of L. E. (Ras) Pool, deceased, construed. The will had theretofore been admitted to probate in the county court of Rusk County.
Judgment was entered by the trial court for plaintiffs (appellees) to the effect that L. E. (Ras) Pool, hereinafter referred to as Ras Pool died intestate, as to the mineral estate in the land belonging to his separate estate, as well as all of his personal propperty.
By points one and three appellants assert that the trial court erred in holding that Ras Pool died intestate "as to the minerals he owned in his separate estate" and "as to the personal property owned by him." By points two and four it is asserted that the trial court erred in failing to hold that Ras Pool impliedly devised his separate mineral estate and his personal property to his sons, Ras Pool, Jr., and Weldon Gladney Pool. The portions of the will pertinent here are:
It will be noted that on the date of the execution of the will there were three esstates involved, namely: (a) the separate estate of Ras Pool, the husband; (b) the separate estate of Malisa Pool, the wife; and (c) the community estate of the two. Likewise, involved are three sets of children, namely; (a) the children of Ras Pool by a former marriage, plaintiffs below and appellees here; (b) the children of Malisa Pool by a former marriage; and (c) the children of Ras Pool and Malisa Pool by their marriage. Since the death of Ras Pool, Malisa Pool has married J. R. Wolkewitz, but for obvious reasons she will be referred to hereafter as Malisa Pool.
By the first paragraph of said will Ras Pool devised to his children by a former marriage the surface estate of his separate real estate. His interest in the community estate was bequeathed to his wife Malisa for life with remainder to their two children, Ras Pool, Jr., and Weldon Gladney Pool. With respect to the mineral estate in Ras Pool's separate lands the will simply states "that none of the...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Rogers v. Hickie
...Huffman v. Huffman, 161 Tex. 267, 339 S.W.2d 885, 889. See also Fain v. Fain, Tex.Civ.App., 335 S.W.2d 663, (Writ Ref.); Wolkewitz v. Wood, Tex.Civ.App., 216 S.W.2d 611; Engelke v. Schultze, Tex.Civ.App., 275 S.W.2d 158, (Writ Dis.); Salvation Army of Texas v. Ford, Tex.Civ.App., 256 S.W.2d......
-
Pinkston v. Pinkston
...as to the remainder of his estate not disposed of in the will, and we think that the rules announced and discussed in Wolkewitz v. Wood, Tex.Civ.App., 216 S.W.2d 611, n. r. e. are applicable and controlling here. See cases there We are in accord with each of the remaining findings of fact b......
-
Dudley v. Jake & Nina Kamin Found.
...663, 664 (Tex. Civ. App.—Fort Worth 1960, writ ref'd) ("There is no residuary clause . . . ."); Wolkewitz v. Wood, 216 S.W.2d 611, 611-12 (Tex. Civ. App.—Texarkana 1948, writ ref'd n.r.e.) (the "portions of the will pertinent" did not contain a residuary ...
-
Urban v. Fossati
...v. Underdown, Willes 293, 125 Eng.Rep. 1179 (1741). This case is troublesome enough without looking for new problems. Wolkewitz v. Wood, Tex.Civ.App., 216 S.W.2d 611, is not helpful either, since the will in that case embraced an express clause against a devise to the claimant. That was a c......