Womack v. Regents of University of N. M., 9154

Decision Date12 April 1971
Docket NumberNo. 9154,9154
Citation1971 NMSC 43,82 N.M. 460,483 P.2d 934
PartiesJames E. WOMACK, Relator-Appellant, v. REGENTS OF the UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO, Respondents-Appellees.
CourtNew Mexico Supreme Court
OPINION

COMPTON, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal by the relator from an order dismissing his application for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to comply with constitutional and statutory requirements in the exercise of their official duties as Regents of the University of New Mexico. The claimed basis for his right of action is that he is a resident taxpayer. Relator is mistaken in this regard. The University of New Mexico is a creature of the Constitution of the State of New Mexico, Art. XII, § 13, augmented by statute, § 73--25--3, N.M.S.A. 1953, and the respondents owe their duties to the State of New Mexico, not to a private person. This being so, it follows that relator, though a taxpayer, has no standing to enforce by mandamus a duty owing to the public. State ex rel. Naramore v. Hensley, 53 N.M. 308, 207 P.2d 529. See 52 Am.Jur.2d, Mandamus, § 391.

This is not to say that a private person may not move for mandamus to enforce a public duty not due to the State. State ex rel. Burg v. City of Albuquerque, 31 N.M. 576, 249 P. 242.

We conclude that appellant was without standing to enforce mandamus. The order should be affirmed.

It is so ordered.

OMAN and STEPHENSON, JJ., concur in result.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • State ex rel. Coll v. Johnson
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of New Mexico
    • September 10, 1999
    ...a more particularized nexus between their specific interests and the duties of state officials. In Womack v. Regents of the Univ. of New Mexico, 82 N.M. 460, 461, 483 P.2d 934, 935 (1971), this Court concluded that "the respondents owe their duties to the State of New Mexico, not to a priva......
  • Korgich v. Regents of New Mexico School of Mines
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (10th Circuit)
    • August 18, 1978
    ...insurance. That case followed Eyring v. Board of Regents, 59 N.M. 3, 277 P.2d 550 (1954); Cf. Womack v. Regents of University of New Mexico, 82 N.M. 460, 483 P.2d 934 (N.M.1971). It is clear that New Mexico considers its institutions of higher learning as state agencies and a state function......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT