Wong v. Bell

Decision Date20 April 1981
Docket NumberNo. 79-3279,79-3279
Citation642 F.2d 359
PartiesShui King Tam WONG, Gong Yuen Wong, Wing Sun Wong, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Griffin B. BELL, Attorney General of the United States et al., Defendants-Appellees.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

Page 359

642 F.2d 359
Shui King Tam WONG, Gong Yuen Wong, Wing Sun Wong,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Griffin B. BELL, Attorney General of the United States et
al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 79-3279.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Feb. 6, 1981.
Decided April 20, 1981.

Page 360

Robert L. Miller, Miller & Miller, Los Angeles, Cal., on briefs, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Lawrence B. Gotlieb, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

Before WALLACE and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges, and MARQUEZ, * District Judge.

FERGUSON, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs challenge defendants' refusal to allow plaintiff Wing Sun Wong into this country. They claim that 8 U.S.C. § 1182(i) entitles Wong to have the Attorney General exercise his discretion as to whether or not to admit Wong. We affirm the dismissal of plaintiffs' lawsuit on the ground, not ruled on below, that plaintiffs' complaint did not state a claim pursuant to which relief could be granted under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6).

I.

Wing Sun Wong lives in Hong Kong. He applied to the American consulate there for a visa in 1958. In his application, he made misrepresentations which barred issuance of a visa. In 1969, he again applied to the consulate in Hong Kong for a visa, which was denied because of the prior misrepresentations. Finally, in 1977, Wong applied for a waiver of excludability under a section of the Immigration and Nationality Act which provides:

Any alien who is the spouse, parent, or child of a United States citizen or of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence and who is excludable because (he sought to procure a visa by misrepresentation) may be granted a visa (within the Attorney General's discretion.)

8 U.S.C. § 1182(i). The term "child" is in turn defined, for purposes of § 1182(i), as "an unmarried person under twenty-one years of age ...." 8 U.S.C. § 1101(b)(1). The Hong Kong district director of the Immigration and Naturalization Service ("INS") denied the application, finding Wong statutorily ineligible for a waiver under § 1182(i) inasmuch as he was 41 years old at the time of his application.

Wong's brother is a United States citizen. His mother is a permanent resident alien lawfully admitted into this country. Wong and his two relatives instituted suit in district court challenging Wong's exclusion; their request for relief was limited to "an...

To continue reading

Request your trial
389 cases
  • Villarino v. Comm'r: Soc. Sec. Admin.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
    • 3 Agosto 2012
    ......Sea-Land Service, Inc., 813 F.2d 986, 991 (9th Cir. 1987); see Wong v. Bell, 642 F.2d 359, 361-362 (9th Cir. 1981). Sua sponte dismissal may be made before process is served on defendants. Neitzke v. Williams, 490 ......
  • Vega v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
    • 26 Agosto 2009
    ......Sea-Land Service, Inc., 813 F.2d 986, 991 (9th Cir. 1987); see Wong v. Bell, 642 F.2d 359, 361-362 (9th Cir.1981). Sua sponte dismissal may be made before process is served on defendants. Neitzke v. Williams, 490 ......
  • Rodela v. Guild Mortg. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
    • 18 Enero 2012
    ......Sea-Land Service, Inc., 813 F.2d 986, 991 (9th Cir. 1987); see Wong v. Bell, 642 F.2d 359, 361-362 (9th Cir. 1981). Sua sponte dismissal may be made before process is served on defendants. Neitzke v. Williams, 490 ......
  • Rojas v. Countywide Corp., CASE NO. CV F 12-1393 LJO JLT
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
    • 21 Septiembre 2012
    ......Sea-Land Service, Inc., 813 F.2d 986, 991 (9th Cir. 1987); see Wong v. Bell, 642 F.2d 359, 361-362 (9th Cir. 1981). Sua sponte dismissal may be made before process is served on defendants. Neitzke v. Williams, 490 ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • THE REMAND POWER AND THE SUPREME COURT'S ROLE.
    • United States
    • Notre Dame Law Review Vol. 96 No. 1, November 2020
    • 1 Noviembre 2020
    ...Mgmt. Co. v. Mendelsohn, 552 U.S. 379, 387 (2008). (240) Kg., Johnson v. Weber, 549 F. App'x 597, 598 (8th Cir. 2014); Wong v. Bell, 642 F.2d 359, 361-62 (9th Cir. 1981). (241) See REYNOLDS ROBERTSON & FRANCIS R. KIRKHAM, JURISDICTION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES [section] ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT