Wood v. Boone Cnty.

CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Iowa
Writing for the CourtDEEMER
Citation153 Iowa 92,133 N.W. 377
Decision Date20 November 1911
PartiesWOOD v. BOONE COUNTY ET AL.

153 Iowa 92
133 N.W. 377

WOOD
v.
BOONE COUNTY ET AL.

Supreme Court of Iowa.

Nov. 20, 1911.


Appeal from District Court, Story County; C. G. Lee, Judge.

Action at law to recover damages due to defendants' failure to furnish plaintiff, who was a transient poor person, proper relief. Defendant Keigley was a member of the board of supervisors of defendant county and overseer of the poor of that county. At the close of plaintiff's testimony, the trial court directed a verdict for the defendants, and plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

[133 N.W. 378]

Fitchpatrick & McCall and Robert M. Witwer, for appellant.

Harpel & Cederquist and E. H. Addison, for appellees.


DEEMER, J.

[1] There being no legal obligation at common law upon a county or any of the instrumentalities of government to furnish relief to the poor, plaintiff's action, if he has any, must be bottomed upon some statute of the state entitling him to relief. Cooledge v. Mahaska County, 24 Iowa, 211. His counsel think they find such duty in sections 2225 and 2230 of the Code, reading as follows:

“A person coming from another state, and not having become a citizen of nor having a settlement in the state, applying for relief, may be sent to the state whence he came, at the expense of the county, under an order of the district court or judge; otherwise he is to be temporarily relieved in the county where he applies.” Code, § 2225.

“The township trustees of each township, subject to general rules that may be adopted by the board of supervisors, shall provide for the relief of such poor persons in their respective townships as should not, in their judgment, be sent to the county home. But where a city is embraced, in whole or in part, within the limits of any township, the board of supervisors may appoint an overseer of the poor, who shall have within said city, or part thereof, all the powers and duties conferred by this chapter on the township trustees. The relief may be either in the form of food, rent or clothing, fuel and lights, medical attendance, or in money, and shall not exceed two dollars per week for each person for whom relief is thus furnished, exclusive of medical attendance. They may require any able-bodied person to labor faithfully on the streets or highways at the rate of five cents per hour in payment for and as a condition of granting relief; said labor shall be performed under the direction of the officers having charge of working streets and highways. When medical services are rendered by order of the trustees or overseers of the poor, no more shall be charged or paid therefor than is usually charged for like services in the neighborhood where such services are rendered. No supervisors, trustee or overseer shall be directly or indirectly interested in any supplies furnished the poor.” Code, § 2230.

“The poor must make application for relief to the trustees of the township where they may be, and if the trustees are satisfied that the applicant is in such a state of want as requires relief at the public expense, they may afford such relief, subject to the approval of the board of supervisors, as the necessities of the person require, and shall report the case forthwith to the board of supervisors, who may continue or deny relief, as they find cause. The board of supervisors may examine into all claims, including claims for medical attendance, allowed by the township trustees for the support of the poor, and, if they find the amount allowed by said trustees to be unreasonable, exorbitant or for any goods or services other than for the necessaries of life, they may reject or diminish the claim as in their judgment would be right and just and this act shall apply to all counties in the state, whether there are county homes established in the same or not. This act shall apply to acts of overseers of poor in cities as well as to township trustees.” Code, § 2234.

In addition to these sections, we quote the following as having some bearing upon the case:

“Persons coming into the state, or going from one county to another, who are county charges or are likely to become such, may be prevented from acquiring a settlement by the authorities of the county, township or city in which such persons are found warning them to depart therefrom. After such warning, such persons cannot acquire a settlement except by the requisite residence of one year without further warning.” Code, § 2226.

“Such warning shall be in writing, and may be served upon the order of the trustees of the township, or of the board of supervisors, by any person; and such person shall make a return of his doings thereon to the board of supervisors, which, if not made by a sworn officer, must be verified by affidavit.” Code, § 2227.

“The trustees in each township, in counties where there is no county home, have the oversight and care of all poor persons in their township, and shall see that they receive proper care until provided for by the board of supervisors.” Code, § 2233.

“All claims and bills for the care and support of the poor shall be certified to be correct by the proper trustees and presented to the board of supervisors, and, if they are satisfied that they are reasonable and proper, they shall be paid out of the county treasury. In no case shall a trustee, or either of the trustees, nor overseer of the poor, draw an order upon himself, or upon either of the board for supplies for the poor, except such trustees or overseer has a contract to furnish said supplies.” Code, § 2235.

“The board of supervisors may make contracts with the lowest responsible bidder for furnishing any or all supplies, medical attendance or services required for the poor, for a term not exceeding one year, or it may enter into a contract with the lowest responsible bidder, through proposals opened and examined at a regular session of the

[133 N.W. 379]

board, for the support of any or all the poor of the county for one year at a time, and may make any requisite orders to that effect, and shall require all such contractors to give bonds in such sum as it believes sufficient to secure the faithful performance of the same.” Code, § 2238.

“The word ‘poor’ and ‘poor person’ as used in this chapter shall be construed to mean those who have no property, exempt or otherwise, and are unable, because of physical or mental disabilities, to earn a living by labor; but this section shall not be construed to forbid aid to needy persons who have some means, when the board shall be of opinion that the same will be conducive to their welfare and the best interests of the public.” Code, § 2252.

Now the charge in the petition is, in substance, that plaintiff was a foreign pauper; that he came into defendant county about January 25, 1908, with badly frozen feet which needed medical attention; that defendant Keigley was a member of the board of supervisors of defendant county, and a committee on and the overseer of the poor; that plaintiff made application to the defendant through its proper officers for relief, and that defendant undertook to furnish him some relief, but that, after undertaking the same, it negligently, wrongfully, and unlawfully withheld adequate or proper treatment, and on the 27th day of January “expelled plaintiff from Boone county,” subjecting him to exposure, and depriving him of proper care until he reached Cerro Gordo county on the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
24 practice notes
  • Ross v. Schackel, No. 930629
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Utah
    • July 12, 1996
    ...any cases specifically addressing the liability of government-employed doctors at the turn of the century. Cf. Wood v. Boone County, 153 Iowa 92, 133 N.W. 377, 380-81 (1911) (finding that county overseer of poor was immune from liability for failing to ensure that adequate medical attention......
  • Godfrey v. State, No. 15-0695
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Iowa
    • June 30, 2017
    ...that the Iowa Constitution provides plaintiffs a remedy, absent some kind of clear legislative action. See also Wood v. Boone Cty. , 153 Iowa 92, 100, 133 N.W. 377, 380 (1911) ("It is a general rule that, where a governmental duty rests upon a state or any of its instrumentalities, the......
  • Strickfaden v. Green Creek Highway Dist.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Idaho
    • July 10, 1926
    ...Idaho 126, 95 Am. St. 166, 47 P. 93; Youmans v. Thornton, 31 Idaho 10, 168 P. 1141; McConnell v. Dewey, 5 Neb. 385; Wood v. Boone County, 153 Iowa 92, Ann. Cas. 1913D, 1070, 133 N.W. 377, 39 L. R. A., N. S., 168; Gibson v. Sioux County, 183 Iowa 1006, 168 N.W. 80; Snethen v. Harrison County......
  • Shirkey v. Keokuk Cnty., No. 44022.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Iowa
    • October 26, 1937
    ...v. Wapello County, 129 Iowa 77, 105 N.W. 363, 6 Ann.Cas. 958;Wenck v. Carroll County, 140 Iowa 558, 178 N.W. 900;Wood v. Boone County, 153 Iowa 92, 133 N.W. 377, 39 L.R.A.(N.S.) 168, Ann.Cas.1913D, 1070;Snethen v. Harrison County, 172 Iowa 81, 152 N.W. 12;Cunningham v. Adair County, 190 Iow......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
24 cases
  • Ross v. Schackel, No. 930629
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Utah
    • July 12, 1996
    ...any cases specifically addressing the liability of government-employed doctors at the turn of the century. Cf. Wood v. Boone County, 153 Iowa 92, 133 N.W. 377, 380-81 (1911) (finding that county overseer of poor was immune from liability for failing to ensure that adequate medical attention......
  • Godfrey v. State, No. 15-0695
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Iowa
    • June 30, 2017
    ...that the Iowa Constitution provides plaintiffs a remedy, absent some kind of clear legislative action. See also Wood v. Boone Cty. , 153 Iowa 92, 100, 133 N.W. 377, 380 (1911) ("It is a general rule that, where a governmental duty rests upon a state or any of its instrumentalities, the......
  • Strickfaden v. Green Creek Highway Dist.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Idaho
    • July 10, 1926
    ...Idaho 126, 95 Am. St. 166, 47 P. 93; Youmans v. Thornton, 31 Idaho 10, 168 P. 1141; McConnell v. Dewey, 5 Neb. 385; Wood v. Boone County, 153 Iowa 92, Ann. Cas. 1913D, 1070, 133 N.W. 377, 39 L. R. A., N. S., 168; Gibson v. Sioux County, 183 Iowa 1006, 168 N.W. 80; Snethen v. Harrison County......
  • Shirkey v. Keokuk Cnty., No. 44022.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Iowa
    • October 26, 1937
    ...v. Wapello County, 129 Iowa 77, 105 N.W. 363, 6 Ann.Cas. 958;Wenck v. Carroll County, 140 Iowa 558, 178 N.W. 900;Wood v. Boone County, 153 Iowa 92, 133 N.W. 377, 39 L.R.A.(N.S.) 168, Ann.Cas.1913D, 1070;Snethen v. Harrison County, 172 Iowa 81, 152 N.W. 12;Cunningham v. Adair County, 190 Iow......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT