Wood v. Mercedes-Benz of Oklahoma City
| Docket Number | 108555 |
| Decision Date | 16 July 2014 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
52 cases
-
In re Amendments to the Okla. Unif. Jury Instructions
...create the dangerous condition.").In a case where there is a duty for open and obvious dangers under Wood v. Mercedes--Benz of Okla. City, 2014 OK 68, ¶ 9, 336 P.3d 457, 460, the word "hidden" in the second sentence of the Instruction should be deleted.CommentsThe following statement of a p......
-
Livings v. Sage's Inv. Grp., LLC
...doctrine when the plaintiff had to confront the condition " ‘in furtherance of her employment’ "), quoting Wood v. Mercedes-Benz , 336 P.3d 457, 460 n. 8, 2014 OK 68 (2014) ; Staples v. Krack Corp. , 186 F.3d 977 (7th Cir. 1999) (applying Illinois law containing this standard); Hale v. Beck......
-
Tyree v. Cornman
...is imposed by law on any landowner or occupier, and regardless of any contractual obligation to do so. See Wood v. Mercedes-Benz of Oklahoma City , 2014 OK 68, ¶ 5, 336 P.3d 457. No such duty is alleged in this case.¶21 Illustration 2 for comment "a" to section 352 of the Restatement of Age......
-
Tucker v. Cochran Firm-Criminal Def. Birmingham L. L.C.
...includes giving notice of certain judicial events altering legally cognizable rights.”).64 See, e.g., Wood v. Mercedes–Benz of Oklahoma City, 2014 OK 68, ¶ 4, 336 P.3d 457, 459 (When examining an order sustaining summary judgment, this Court determines whether the record reveals disputed ma......
Get Started for Free