Wood v. Wood
| Decision Date | 30 May 1963 |
| Docket Number | 6 Div. 903 |
| Citation | 154 So.2d 661,275 Ala. 305 |
| Parties | Patricia Anglin WOOD v. James F. WOOD. |
| Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Jerry O. Lorant and Geo. J. Bouloukos, Birmingham, for appellant.
Beddow, Embry & Beddow, Birmingham, for appellee.
Appeal by the complainant from a decree of the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, in Equity, denying full relief on a 'Petition to Determine Exact Amount of Arrearage and Revival of Judgment'.
The parties to this appeal were divorced, November 16, 1945. The decree, a vinculo matrimonii, anong other things provided:
'B: That the Respondent pay to the Complainant the sum of Six ($6.00) Dollars per week for the support and maintenance of the aforesaid minor child, and in addition thereto shall purchase all of the necessary clothing for said child.'
Appellee made no payments under the decree nor did he purchase the necessary clothing for the child, after January 1, 1946. Appellant sought by this present action to collect the sum of $10,320.00 which represents the $6.00 per week payments, a clothing allowance, and interest on the total claimed. The decree, below, fixed the accrued arrearage in the sum of $3,477.00, ordering appellee to pay appellant $100.00 a month until the liquidation of the arrearage, or at appellee's option any greater sum per month until the arrearage was satisfied.
The facts of this case are undisputed, with the exception of the so-called 'clothing allowance' sought by appellant, which is not governed by the same rule as the fixed weekly installments. The unascertained clothing allowance is not a final judgment and may be disallowed in the discretion of the trial court.
Appellee moved to Pennsylvania some four months after the divorce, remaining there until 1958, at which time he returned to Alabama. Their son was just finishing Riverside Military Academy in Georgia when appellee returned to Alabama. Appellant had worked at the school and sent the son through to graduation. The son is presently in the navy and is sulf-sufficient. At no time prior to this suit had any court action been instituted by appellant to enforce the child support payments, nor did appellee ever seek a modification of the decree. It did appear, however, that appellant sought the aid of the juvenile court in Birmingham and attempted to obtain counsel in Georgia and Pennsylvania to enforce payments.
The questions arising on this appeal can be determined by the consideration of one issue, viz., does the equity court have the power to retroacively modify accrued arrearages of child support payments due under a decree of divorce a vinculo matrimonii?
Our cases clearly enunciate the rule that installment payments decreed in a divorce for support and education of the minor child of a marriage become final judgments as of the dates due and may be collected as other judgments. Armstrong v. Green, 260 Ala. 39 (Rehearing Op., p. 45), 68 So.2d 834, 839. And installments which mature before a petition to modify is filed are immune from change. Scott v. Scott, 265 Ala. 208, 90 So.2d 813, and cases cited. Such is the status of the accrued weekly payments...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Whitt v. Whitt
...power of the court to avoid a part of the sum due during the months of January through April of 1962 for child support.--Wood v. Wood, 275 Ala. 305, 154 So.2d 661, and cases cited; Morgan v. Morgan, 275 Ala. 461, 156 So.2d 147. The support installments decreed by the divorce decree became f......
-
Iverson v. Iverson
...Ins. Co. v. Standfier, Tex.Civ.App. [1935] 86 S.W.2d 852; Coane v. Girard Trust Co. [1944] 182 Md. 577, 35 A.2d 449; Wood v. Wood [1963] 275 Ala. 305, 154 So.2d 661; Petition for Adoption of An Infant by Vermeulen, Fla.App. [1959] 114 So.2d 192; Solomon v. Beatty, Fla. [1953] 68 So.2d 881, ......
-
Headley v. Headley
...through the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court. See Ex parte Headley, 275 Ala. 262, 154 So.2d 20. In our recent case of Wood v. Wood, 275 Ala. 305, 154 So.2d 661, we 'Our cases clearly enunciate the rule that installment payments decreed in a divorce for support and education of the mino......
-
Melvin v. Furr
...respect is contrary to the rule applied in Armstrong v. Green, supra. As we view it, the Mooty case does not apply here. See: Wood v. Wood, Ala., 154 So.2d 661. The following statement seems '* * * However, we are of the opinion that even a court of equity, in an effort to do equity, cannot......