Woodall v. Southern Mfg. Co.

CourtAlabama Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtTHOMAS, J.
CitationWoodall v. Southern Mfg. Co., 223 Ala. 262, 135 So. 446 (Ala. 1931)
Decision Date18 June 1931
Docket Number7 Div. 2.
PartiesWOODALL v. SOUTHERN MFG. CO.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Etowah County; O. A. Steele, Judge.

Bill to enforce a materialman's lien by the Southern Manufacturing Company against Mrs. Willie L. Woodall. From a decree overruling a demurrer to the bill, respondent appeals.

Affirmed.

Miller & Miller, of Gadsden, for appellant.

W. T Murphree, of Gadsden, for appellee.

THOMAS J.

The appeal is from a decree overruling demurrer to the bill as amended to enforce the materialman's lien on real property improved.

The original bill, exhibits, and the amendment will be considered together as one pleading, and may supplement the other on demurrer. Grimsley v. First Ave. Coal & Lbr. Co., 217 Ala. 159, 115 So. 90.

The right to proceed in equity for the enforcement of liens of this character is given by section 8842 of the Code.

The allegation of the bill is that, after the home was finished the parties had an agreement as to when the price of the materials was to be paid. The debt therefore matured in the agreed monthly installments averred, and this was not a novation of the building contract with the owner, and not a discharge of the lien thereon.

A court of equity will not enforce the claim of respondent that the suit was brought before the claim accrued. It is averred the installment payments were not made before the bankruptcy, and she may not, while in default and bankruptcy, secure a homestead freed of the builder's lien, under an agreement of extended payments or accrual of the claim. The suit was not instituted before the maturity of the debt. Lane & Bodley Co. v Jones, 79 Ala. 156; Cutcliff v. McAnally, 88 Ala. 507, 7 So. 331. The suit for lien was within six months after the debt accrued according to the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • Bankers' Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Sloss
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • June 7, 1934
    ... ... Co., 217 Ala. 159, 115 So. 90; Webb v. Sprott, ... 225 Ala. 600, 144 So. 569; Woodall v. Southern Mfg ... Co., 223 Ala. 262, 135 So. 446; Hobson v ... Robertson, 224 Ala. 49, 138 ... ...
  • Schwab v. Carter
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • January 12, 1933
    ... ... considered together as one pleading, and one may supplement ... the other. Woodall v. Southern Mfg. Co., 223 Ala ... 262, 135 So. 446; Grimsley v. First Ave. Coal & Lumber ... ...
  • Cumens v. Garrett
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • September 25, 1975
    ...to give a lien claimant 'a concurrent remedy in equity.' Floyd v. Rambo, 250 Ala. 101, 104, 33 So.2d 360 (1948); Woodall v. Southern Mfg. Co., 223 Ala. 262, 135 So. 446 (1931); Mathis v. Holman, 204 Ala. 373, 85 So. 710 (1920). Other statutes pertinent to the decision in this case are secti......
  • Gains v. Griffin
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • June 9, 1932
    ... ... 12, 14, 123 So. 573; Central Lumber Co. v. Jacks ... et al., 222 Ala. 475, 132 So. 721; Woodall v ... Southern Mfg. Co., 223 Ala. 262, 135 So. 446 ... The ... lands in question are ... ...
  • Get Started for Free