Woodbury v. Beto, 24870.
Decision Date | 14 May 1968 |
Docket Number | No. 24870.,24870. |
Citation | 395 F.2d 189 |
Parties | Dennis WOODBURY, Appellant, v. Dr. George J. BETO, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Appellee. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Stanley S. Crooks, Dallas, Tex., for appellant.
Robert E. Owen, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., Thomas Keever, Asst. Atty. Gen., Houston, Tex., Crawford C. Martin, Atty. Gen. of Texas, George M. Cowden, First Asst. Atty. Gen., A. J. Carubbi, Jr., Executive Asst., R. L. Lattimore, Howard M. Fender, Lonny F. Zwiener, Robert E. Owen, Asst. Attys. Gen., Austin, Tex., for appellee.
Before RIVES, BELL and GOLDBERG, Circuit Judges.
This appeal is from a judgment dismissing without a plenary hearing an application for writ of habeas corpus. We vacate the judgment and remand for dismissal without prejudice to appellant's right to seek relief in the Texas court in which he was originally tried and convicted.
Among other grounds, the application alleges that involuntary statements and actions which were coerced were used in the appellant's trial to obtain a conviction. For example, the application contains the following averments.
Upon his trial, evidence was introduced that the appellant led the officers to the body of the man he was convicted of killing and made the statement: The appellant was found guilty of murder with malice and sentenced to serve not less than two years nor more than life in the State Penitentiary. The Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas affirmed the judgment. Woodbury v. State of Texas, 1962, 172 Tex.Cr.R. 379, 357 S.W.2d 399.
Appellant first filed an application for writ of habeas corpus in a Texas district court, which application was denied with instructions to file in the Court of Criminal Appeals. Appellant then filed his application for habeas corpus...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Phelper v. Decker
...5 Cir., 1968, 398 F. 2d 814; Van Skike v. Beto, 5 Cir., 1968, 398 F.2d 407; Bruce v. Beto, 5 Cir., 1968, 396 F.2d 212; Woodbury v. Beto, 5 Cir., 1968, 395 F.2d 189; Beto v. Conley, 5 Cir., 1968, 393 F.2d 497; Taylor v. Beto, 5 Cir., 1968, 392 F.2d 566; Waters v. Beto, 5 Cir., 1968, 387 F.2d......
-
Peters v. Rutledge
...Writ, without prejudice to Payton's right to reapply for relief to the State court in which he was convicted." 14 See also Woodbury v. Beto, 5 Cir., 1968, 395 F.2d 189; Taylor v. Beto, 5 Cir., 1968, 392 F.2d 566; Beto v. Conley, 5 Cir., 1968, 393 F.2d 497; Waters v. Beto, 5 Cir., 1968, 392 ......
-
Boyer v. City of Orlando
...Beto, 5 Cir., 1968, 392 F.2d 74; Beto v. Conley, 5 Cir., 1968, 393 F.2d 497; Taylor v. Beto, 5 Cir., 1968, 392 F.2d 566; Woodbury v. Beto, 5 Cir., 1968, 395 F.2d 189; Bruce v. Beto, 5 Cir., 1968, 396 F.2d 212; Peters v. Rutledge, 5 Cir., 1968, 397 F.2d 731; Moore v. Dutton, 5 Cir., 1968, 39......
-
Spencer v. Wainwright
...1968; Beto v. Conley, 5 Cir. 1968, 393 F.2d 497 April 3, 1968; Taylor v. Beto, 5 Cir., 1968, 392 F.2d 566 April 19, 1968; Woodbury v. Beto, 5 Cir., 1968, 395 F.2d 189 May 14, 1968; Bruce v. Beto, 5 Cir., 1968, 396 F.2d 212 May 27, 1968; Peters v. Rutledge, 5 Cir., 1968, 397 F.2d 731; Moore ......