Woodmen of the World v. McHenry
Decision Date | 16 November 1916 |
Docket Number | 6 Div. 187 |
Citation | 197 Ala. 541,73 So. 97 |
Parties | WOODMEN OF THE WORLD v. McHENRY. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; E.C. Crow, Judge.
Action by Mrs. J.F. McHenry against Woodmen of the World. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Reversed and remanded.
C.H Roquemore and E.T. Graham, both of Montgomery, for appellant.
Murray & Hanna, of Birmingham, for appellee.
The appellee prevailed in her action, which is rested on a policy of life insurance alleged to have validly issued, on May 23 1914, for one year, on her husband's life, by the appellant, a voluntary fraternal benefit society, the correct corporate name of which is shown to be Sovereign Camp of the Woodmen of the World. The insured, J.F. McHenry, died June 30, 1914; only 38 days after the date of the policy, and 45 days after he had signed the application for the insurance.
In addition to the general issue to the averments of the single count (numbered 5) submitted to the jury, the defendant interposed its defense through 13 pleas. Pleas numbered from 2 to 11, inclusive, assert, as a bar to a recovery on the policy, false representations or breaches of warranties by the insured, viz., that he had never had or suffered from disease of the kidneys; that he had never suffered from shortness of breath; that he had never had or suffered from hemorrhoids; that he had not, during the preceding five years, consulted or been attended by a physician for any disease or injury; that he had not theretofore failed to obtain life insurance from any life insurance company. Pleas 13 and 14 assert that the contract was unenforceable because the applicant was not in good health when the certificate of insurance was delivered to him. These defenses were predicated of provisions of the laws of the order and of statements of the application signed by the insured. The false representations or breaches of warranty relied on in bar of a recovery on the policy ("beneficiary certificate") were predicated, in some of the pleas upon these provisions contained in the "beneficiary certificate" sued on:
and upon these provisions incorporated in the application of McHenry to join the order:
"I hereby certify, agree and warrant that all of the statements, representations and answers in this application, consisting of two pages as aforesaid, are full, complete and true, and whether written by my own hand or not, I agree that if any untrue statement or answer is made by me in this application, or to the examining physician, or any concealment of facts in this application, or to the examining physician, intentional or otherwise, then my beneficiary certificate shall become void and all right of any person or persons thereunder shall become forfeited"
and upon these questions and answers contained in the application:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Fraternal Aid Union v. Whitehead
...of law, our sister state of Alabama recently sustained the validity of this law and denied recovery in the case of Woodmen of the World v. McHenry, 73 So. 97. Likewise our sister state, Louisiana, on the west has upheld said section 20 in a very recent case Bargainer v. Knights of Maccabees......
-
Sovereign Camp, W.O.W. v. Allen
... ... Gwin, Judge ... Action ... by Virgie Allen against the Sovereign Camp of the Woodmen of ... the World upon a beneficiary life certificate payable to her ... and issued to Eugene ... Section 20, Acts 1911, p. 700; W.O.W. v. McHenry, ... 197 Ala. 541, 73 So. 97; Beiser v. Sov. Camp, 199 ... Ala. 41, 74 So. 235 ... It ... ...
-
Woodmen of the World v. Maynor
... ... part of the contract, and the insured signed and made the ... contract, then he would be presumed to know the contents of ... the contract, and the laws of the corporation, and the ... fraternal order would not be barred by the waiver. W.O.W ... v. McHenry, 197 Ala. 541, 73 So. 97; Beiser v. Sov ... Camp, 199 Ala. 41, 74 So. 235; Sov. Camp, W.O.W., v ... Allen, 89 So. 58; W.O.W. v. Alford, 89 So. 528 ... Our Legislature has enacted the following law on this ... "The constitution and laws of the society may provide ... that no subordinate ... ...
-
Supreme Ruler of Mystic Circle v. Darwin
... ... Code. Eminent Household of Columbian Woodmen v ... Blackerby, 78 So. 821; Locomotive Engineers Ins. Co ... v. Hughes, 77 So. 352, wherein ... Lile, 76 So. 450, Beiser v. Sov. Camp, ... W.O.W., 74 So. 235, and Woodmen v. McHenry, 73 ... So. 97, involved certificates issued subsequent to the act of ... The ... ...