Woodmen of World Life v. Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co.
Citation | 561 F. Supp. 640 |
Decision Date | 17 September 1982 |
Docket Number | No. 82 C 1673.,82 C 1673. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois |
Parties | WOODMEN OF the WORLD LIFE INSURANCE SOCIETY, Plaintiff, v. The GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC., Defendant. |
Stone, Pogrund & Korey, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.
Kenneth R. Gaines, Lionel G. Gross, Rex A. Logemann, Altheimer & Gray, Chicago, Ill., for defendant.
This is an action originally brought in the Circuit Court of Cook County under the Illinois Forcible Entry and Detainer Act, Ill.Rev.Stat. ch. 57 ¶ 1 et seq. Plaintiff Woodmen of the World Life Insurance Society, Inc. seeks to recover rent and possession of the premises at 419 North LaGrange Road, LaGrange Park, Illinois, from its tenant, defendant The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company ("A & P"). Plaintiff seeks to terminate the lease because A & P allegedly failed to pay plaintiff for a sign erected on the premises and failed to cure this default in the requisite time. A & P removed the case to this court on March 17, 1982. Now plaintiff asks that the case be remanded to the Circuit Court because the amount in controversy is less than $10,000.00.
Plaintiff claims that an action under the Illinois Forcible Entry and Detainer Act is limited to the right to possession and the amount of rent owed — $5,334.40 in this case. A & P contends that the jurisdictional amount requirement is satisfied because the value of the lease or the right to possess and utilize the premises over the term of the original lease, including options to renew, exceeds $10,000.00. In addition, A & P contends that the cost of renting like premises exceeds $10,000.00; that if the lease were terminated, it would lose the right to assign or sublet (by which A & P could recoup more than $10,000.00); and that the value of its fixtures and equipment would be reduced by more than $10,000.00.
Section 5 of the Forcible Entry and Detainer Act, Ill.Rev.Stat. ch. 57, § 5, provides, in part, that "no matters not germane to the distinctive purpose of the proceeding shall be introduced by joinder, counterclaim, or otherwise ...." The general purpose of a forcible entry and detainer action is to adjudicate the parties' right to possession of the premises, and therefore such proceedings should not be burdened with matters not directly related to the issue of possession. General Parking Corp. v. Kimmel, 79 Ill.App.3d 883, 35 Ill.Dec. 154, 398 N.E.2d 1104 (1st Dist.1979). Plaintiff's citations clearly support the proposition that forcible entry and detainer actions are limited in scope. Id.; Clark Oil & Refining Corp. v. Banks, 34 Ill.App.3d 67, 339 N.E.2d 283 (1st Dist.1975).
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Prince v. Rescorp Realty, No. 90-3082
...185 (7th Cir.1991); see also Barnes v. Callaghan & Co., 559 F.2d 1102, 1105 & n. 4 (7th Cir.1977); Woodmen of World Life Ins. Soc. v. Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., 561 F.Supp. 640, 641-42 Under Illinois law, an employee must demonstrate two elements to establish a cause of action for retaliato......
- Mcc Mortgage Lp v. Office Depot Inc, Civ. No. 10-191 (RHK/JJK).
-
Mutual First, Inc. v. O'Charleys of Gulfport, Inc., Civ. A. No. 89-0575-BH-M.
...was held to be the value of exclusive possession of the land for the term of the lease. Id. In Woodmen of World Life v. Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., 561 F.Supp. 640 (N.D.Ill.1982), the Court recognized that the value to the plaintiff of having the property free to lease to tenants other than ......
-
Barrington Bank & Trust Co. v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp.
...Ill. Aug. 11, 2014) (exercising jurisdiction over an Illinois eviction counterclaim); Woodmen of World Life Ins. Soc. v. Great Atl. Pac. Tea Co., Inc., 561 F. Supp. 640, 641-42 (N.D. Ill. 1982) (refusing to remand an Illinois eviction action because the court had diversity jurisdiction). Th......