Woods v. U.S., Dept. of Transp., 81-3212

Decision Date04 August 1982
Docket NumberNo. 81-3212,81-3212
Citation681 F.2d 988
PartiesJohn R. WOODS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and United States Coast Guard, Defendants-Appellees. Summary Calendar.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

John S. Hunter, New Orleans, La., for plaintiff-appellant.

William F. Baity, Asst. U. S. Atty., New Orleans, La., for defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.

Before RUBIN, JOHNSON and GARWOOD, Circuit Judges.

ALVIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge:

The holder of a master's license challenges the Coast Guard's admonishment of him for negligence. Finding that the district court correctly upheld the Coast Guard action, we affirm.

About 6:00 a. m. on July 27, 1976, Woods was operating the M/V BILL FROREICH in the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, pushing four empty barges in tandem, each about 190 feet long. The weather was good, the day clear. As the FROREICH flotilla entered a bend in the waterway, Woods saw an approaching flotilla, then about 200 yards from the M/V FROREICH's lead barge. Woods gave a one-whistle warning to indicate a port-to-port passing, and reversed his engines. The flotillas passed without incident, but the M/V FROREICH's lead barge collided with a wharf and a boat moored to the bank.

This allision resulted in a charge of negligence being brought against Woods by the Coast Guard. An administrative law judge conducted a hearing and admonished appellant pursuant to the Coast Guard's charge. The Coast Guard Vice Commandant affirmed the ALJ's decision on appeal. Stating that there was sufficient evidence in the record to support the ALJ's decision, the district court granted appellee's motion for summary judgment.

When a moving vessel collides with a fixed object there is a presumption that the moving vessel is at fault, and this presumption suffices to make out a prima facie case of negligence against the vessel. Brown and Root Marine Operators, Inc. v. Zapata Off-Shore Co., 377 F.2d 724, 726 (5th Cir. 1967). The burden of disproof of fault by the moving vessel requires demonstration that its operator did all that reasonable care required. Id. The presumption of negligence applies to the operator as well as to the vessel. It works against all parties participating in the management of the vessel at the time of contact. Merrill Trust Co. v. Bradford, 507 F.2d 467, 471 (1st Cir. 1974). See also Freeport Sulphur Co. v. S/S HERMOSA, 526 F.2d 300, 302 n. 1 (5th Cir. 1976).

Relying on Coast Guard Commandant Decision Appeal No. 2086 (Erikson) (unreported), Woods asserts the erroneous position that he cannot be held negligent upon an unrebutted presumption. However, the defendant in Erikson rebutted the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
18 cases
  • Pillsbury Co. v. Midland Enterprises, Inc., Civ. A. No. 87-5041.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Louisiana
    • June 21, 1989
    ...this Court is able to resolve this case solely on negligence grounds, the Court does not decide this issue. 43 See Woods v. United States, 681 F.2d 988, 990 (5th Cir.1982) (compulsory pilot was presumed negligent); cf. Compania de Navigacion Porto Ronco v. S/S American Oriole, 474 F.Supp. 2......
  • SCF Waxler Marine LLC v. M/V Aris T
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Louisiana
    • November 19, 2019
    ...Bridge , 558 F.2d 790, 795 (5th Cir. 1977) ; Delta Transload , 818 F.2d at 449 ; James , 686 F.2d at 1132 ; Woods v. U.S. Dep't of Transp. , 681 F.2d 988, 990 (5th Cir. 1982) ). The Oregon Rule's "presumption derives from the common-sense observation that moving vessels do not usually colli......
  • McDonald v. Department of Professional Regulation, Bd. of Pilot Com'rs
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 13, 1991
    ...weather conditions or mechanical difficulties is prima facie evidence of negligence in piloting the vessel. Woods v. United States Dep't of Transp., 681 F.2d 988, 990 (5th Cir.1982). However, due to the difficulty of the maneuver attempted, the hearing officer recommended a $500 fine, rathe......
  • Bunge Corporation v. Freeport Marine Repair Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • February 9, 2001
    ...operates not just against the ship, but against all parties who participated in the management of the vessel. Woods v. Department of Transp., 681 F.2d 988, 990 (5th Cir.1982). Therefore, when the district court determined that Hull No. 40 fell within the purview of the Louisiana Rule, Freep......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT