Woods v. Universal City Studios, Inc., No. 96 Civ. 1516 (MGC).
Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit) |
Writing for the Court | CEDARBAUM |
Citation | 920 F. Supp. 62 |
Parties | Lebbeus WOODS, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS, INC., Atlas Entertainment, Inc., Terry Gilliam and Jeffrey Beecroft, Defendants. |
Docket Number | No. 96 Civ. 1516 (MGC). |
Decision Date | 29 March 1996 |
920 F. Supp. 62
Lebbeus WOODS, Plaintiff,
v.
UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS, INC., Atlas Entertainment, Inc., Terry Gilliam and Jeffrey Beecroft, Defendants.
No. 96 Civ. 1516 (MGC).
United States District Court, S.D. New York.
March 29, 1996.
Moses & Singer by Peter Herbert, Philippe Zimmerman, New York City, Law Offices of James P. Tierney by James P. Tierney, Peter J. Anderson, Santa Monica, CA, for Plaintiff.
Vladeck, Waldman, Elias & Engelhard by Anne C. Vladeck, New York City, Leopold, Petrich & Smith by Louis P. Petrich, Gary M. Grossenbacher, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant Universal City Studios, Inc.
OPINION
CEDARBAUM, District Judge.
Lebbeus Woods sues Universal City Studios, Inc. for infringement of his copyright in a drawing. Woods has moved for a preliminary injunction enjoining Universal from distributing, exhibiting, performing or copying those portions of the motion picture entitled 12 Monkeys which reproduce his copyrighted drawing, or any portion of it. For the reasons that follow, Woods' motion is granted.
Background
In 1987, Woods created with graphite pencil a detailed drawing entitled "Neomechanical Tower (Upper) Chamber," which depicted a chamber with a high ceiling, a chair mounted on a wall and a sphere suspended in front of the chair. (Woods Aff. ¶ 7 & Exh. 1.) The wall and floor of the chamber are comprised of large rectangles with visible joints forming a grid pattern. (Id., Exh. 1.) The chair, whose back, seat, front and footrest are each comprised of rectangles, is attached to a vertical rail on one wall. (Id.) The sphere is supported by a metal-frame armature and held aloft directly in front of the chair at face level. (Id.) Cables loop beneath the chair and the sphere. (Id.) This version of "(Upper) Chamber" appeared in a catalog entitled Lebbeus Woods/Centricity, published in Germany in 1987. (Id. ¶ 7.) In 1991, Woods colored his black and white drawing of "(Upper) Chamber," and this version was included in a collection of Woods' illustrations entitled Lebbeus Woods/The New City, published in the United States in 1992. (Id. ¶¶ 8-9.)
In late December 1995, Universal released 12 Monkeys. At the start of the movie, the main character is brought into a room where he is told to sit in a chair which is attached to a vertical rail on a wall. The chair slides up the rail to a horizontal ledge on the wall so that the chair is several yards above the ground. A sphere supported by a metal-frame armature descending from above is suspended directly in front of the main character.
In early January 1996, two of Woods' colleagues told him that they believed 12 Monkeys was using his work. (Woods Aff. ¶ 10.) On January 18, 1996, Woods saw the movie. (Id. ¶ 12.) On January 24, Woods, through his attorney, notified Universal of his claim. (Anderson Aff. ¶ 4.)
Discussion
To obtain a preliminary injunction, Woods must demonstrate: (1) irreparable harm and (2) either a likelihood of success on the merits of his claim, or sufficiently serious questions going to the merits to make them a fair ground for litigation and a balance of hardships tipping decidedly in his favor. Polymer Technology Corp. v. Mimran, 37 F.3d 74, 77-78 (2d Cir.1994).
I. Likelihood of Success on the Merits
To establish infringement of a copyright, a plaintiff must show both ownership of a copyright and that the defendant copied the protected material without authorization. Rogers v. Koons, 960 F.2d 301, 306 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 934, 113 S.Ct. 365, 121 L.Ed.2d 278 (1992).
A. Registration
Section 411(a) of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 411(a) (1988), requires a plaintiff to register a copyright claim before bringing an action for infringement. In 1992, the color version of "(Upper) Chamber" appeared in The New City, a collection of illustrations by Woods. (Woods Aff. ¶ 9 & Exh. 5.) Universal argues that the copyright registration for this book, filed in August 1992, only covers the selection and arrangement of Woods' illustrations, not the earlier published illustrations themselves. However, the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Eastern America Trio Products v. Tang Electronic, No. 98 Civ. 8286(LAK).
...(2d Cir.1997). 137. See PX 12-1, 12-2, 12-3. 138. PX 12-1. 139. PX 12-3. 140. PX 12-2. 141. See Woods v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 920 F.Supp. 62, 64 (S.D.N.Y.1996); Greenwich Film Productions, S.A. v. DRG Records, Inc., 833 F.Supp. 248, 251-52 (S.D.N.Y. 1993); Heyman v. Salle, 743 F.Su......
-
WITHHOLDING INJUNCTIONS IN COPYRIGHT CASES: IMPACTS OF EBAY.
...Inc., 342 F.3d 191, 207 (3d Cir. 2003) (defendant monetized clips of Disney copyrighted films); Woods v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 920 F. Supp. 62, 65 (S.D.N.Y. 1996) (movie copied set design from plaintiff's (184.) Campbell, 510 U.S. at 578 n.10. (185.) Id. at 593-94 (remanding for fur......
-
Muench Photography Inc v. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publ'g Co., No. 09-CV-2669 (LAP).
...individual works, but copyright owner was designer of individual designs within the group); Woods v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 920 F.Supp. 62, 64 (S.D.N.Y.1996) (author who filed registration for collective work was the same author of the individual works that were the subject of the in......
-
Eyal R.D. Corp. v. Jewelex New York, Ltd., No. 07 Civ. 13(CSH).
...owner from bringing a claim for infringement as to individual designs within the group); see also Woods v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 920 F.Supp. 62, 64 (S.D.N.Y.1996) (registration of copyright for collective work satisfies requirements of 17 Page 634 § 411(a) to bring copyright infring......
-
Eastern America Trio Products v. Tang Electronic, No. 98 Civ. 8286(LAK).
...(2d Cir.1997). 137. See PX 12-1, 12-2, 12-3. 138. PX 12-1. 139. PX 12-3. 140. PX 12-2. 141. See Woods v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 920 F.Supp. 62, 64 (S.D.N.Y.1996); Greenwich Film Productions, S.A. v. DRG Records, Inc., 833 F.Supp. 248, 251-52 (S.D.N.Y. 1993); Heyman v. Salle, 743 F.Su......
-
Muench Photography Inc v. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publ'g Co., No. 09-CV-2669 (LAP).
...individual works, but copyright owner was designer of individual designs within the group); Woods v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 920 F.Supp. 62, 64 (S.D.N.Y.1996) (author who filed registration for collective work was the same author of the individual works that were the subject of the in......
-
Eyal R.D. Corp. v. Jewelex New York, Ltd., No. 07 Civ. 13(CSH).
...owner from bringing a claim for infringement as to individual designs within the group); see also Woods v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 920 F.Supp. 62, 64 (S.D.N.Y.1996) (registration of copyright for collective work satisfies requirements of 17 Page 634 § 411(a) to bring copyright infring......
-
Ringgold v. Black Entertainment Televison, Inc., No. 1736
...copyright in a visual work has been infringed by including it within another visual work. Compare Woods v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 920 F.Supp. 62 (S.D.N.Y.1996) (film infringed architectural drawing), with Monster Communications, Inc. v. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc., 935 F.Supp. 4......
-
WITHHOLDING INJUNCTIONS IN COPYRIGHT CASES: IMPACTS OF EBAY.
...Inc., 342 F.3d 191, 207 (3d Cir. 2003) (defendant monetized clips of Disney copyrighted films); Woods v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 920 F. Supp. 62, 65 (S.D.N.Y. 1996) (movie copied set design from plaintiff's (184.) Campbell, 510 U.S. at 578 n.10. (185.) Id. at 593-94 (remanding for fur......