Woodward Iron Co. v. Nunn
Decision Date | 21 April 1921 |
Docket Number | 6 Div. 288 |
Citation | Woodward Iron Co. v. Nunn, 205 Ala. 543, 88 So. 659 (Ala. 1921) |
Parties | WOODWARD IRON CO. v. NUNN. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; Horace C. Wilkinson Judge.
Action by Wiley Nunn against the Woodward Iron Company, for damages for injuries to Matthew Nunn, a minor son of plaintiff, while engaged in the duties of his employment in the mines belonging to the defendant.Judgment for the plaintiff, and defendant appeals.Transferred from Court of Appeals under Acts 1911, p. 449, § 6.Reversed and remanded.
Nesbit & Sadler, of Birmingham, for appellant.
F.D McArthur, of Birmingham, for appellee.
The suit, by the father for injuries to a minor son, was based on the common-law liability of the master to the employé, stated in count 1 and count 4 as amended.The general affirmative charges requested as to each count were refused.
The master's duty was and is to provide and maintain a reasonably safe place for its employé to work, (a) the duty to provide such a safe place being nondelegable.(b) The duty to maintain the place when so provided in a reasonably safe condition may be delegated by the master to its employé.South Brilliant Coal Co. v. McCollum,200 Ala. 543 544, 76 So. 901;Seagle v. Stith Coal Co.,202 Ala 3, 79 So. 301;Woodward Iron Co. v Maxey,200 Ala. 555, 76 So. 913;Langhorne v. Simington...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Procter & Gamble Co. v. Staples
...was a personal duty which could not be delegated. Foreman v. Dorsey Trailers, 256 Ala. 253, 54 So.2d 499 (1951); Woodward Iron Co. v. Nunn, 205 Ala. 543, 88 So. 659 (1921); Woodward Iron Co. v. Boswell, 199 Ala. 424, 75 So. 3 (1917); Chamberlain v. Southern Railway Co., 159 Ala. 171, 48 So.......
-
Fireman's Fund American Ins. Co. v. Coleman
...was a personal duty which could not be delegated. Foreman v. Dorsey Trailers, 256 Ala. 253, 54 So.2d 499 (1951); Woodward Iron Co. v. Nunn, 205 Ala. 543, 88 So. 659 (1921); Woodward Iron Co. v. Boswell, 199 Ala. 424, 75 So. 3 (1917); Chamberlain v. Southern Railway Co., 159 Ala. 171, 48 So.......
-
Foreman v. Dorsey Trailers
...Gentry v. Swann Chemical Co., 234 Ala. 313(3), 174 So. 530; Woodward Iron Co. v. Boswell, 199 Ala. 424, 75 So. 3; Woodward Iron Co. v. Nunn, 205 Ala. 543, 88 So. 659; Langhorne v. Simington, 188 Ala. 337, 66 So. 85; but to maintain its safety, if reasonably safe when the work began, may be ......
- Stollenwerck v. Fourth Nat. Bank