Woody v. United States
| Decision Date | 23 March 1959 |
| Docket Number | No. 135,135 |
| Parties | Billy G. WOODY, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Mr. Clarence O. Woolsey, for petitioner.
Beatrice Rosenberg (Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Anderson and Mr. Robert G. Maysack, on the brief), for the United States.
Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
The Judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Mr. Justice STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
To continue reading
Request your trial
15 cases
-
United States v. Tyler
... ... United States v. Thompson, 442 F.2d 1333 (6 Cir. 1971); Linkenauger v. United States, 357 F.2d 925 (6 Cir. 1966); United States v. Lankford, 296 F.2d 34 (4 Cir. 1961); Woody v. United States, 258 F.2d 535, 536 (6 Cir. 1957), aff\'d by an equally divided Court, 359 U.S. 118 , 79 S.Ct. 721, 3 L.Ed.2d 673 (1959); Madsen v. United States, 165 F.2d 507, 510 (10 Cir. 1947). We would see no reason for not following the other Circuits on this issue even if appellants had been ... ...
-
United States v. Ploof
...v. Lankford, 296 F.2d 34 (4 Cir. 1961); Woody v. United States, 258 F.2d 535, 536 (6 Cir. 1957), aff'd by an equally divided Court, 359 U.S. 118 (1959); Madsen v. United States, 165 F.2d 507, 510 (10 Cir. 1947). We would see no reason for not following the other Circuits on this issue even ......
-
Barker v. State of Ohio, 15444.
...States, 139 F.2d 482, C.A.5th. See also: Woody v. United States, 258 F.2d 535, C.A.6th, affirmed by equally divided court, 359 U.S. 118, 79 S.Ct. 721, 3 L.Ed. 2d 673, rehearing denied, 359 U.S. 985, 79 S.Ct. 939, 3 L.Ed.2d It appears clear that Section 2913.01 of the Revised Code of Ohio pr......
-
United States v. Bunch, Crim. No. K-74-0754.
... ... Pifer v. United States, 158 F.2d 867 (4th Cir., 1946), cert. denied, 329 U.S. 815, 67 S.Ct. 636, 91 L.Ed. 695 (1947). The Sixth Circuit has reached the same conclusion. Woody v. United States, 258 F.2d 535 (6th Cir., 1957), aff'd per curiam, 359 U.S. 118, 79 S.Ct. 721, 3 L.Ed.2d 673 (1959). Emphasis in original ... Judge Craven also wrote (at 36): ... Finally, appellant strenuously urges that the automobile involved in count six was not a stolen motor ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results