Wooster v. Cooper

Decision Date09 March 1896
Citation53 N.J.E. 682,33 A. 1050
PartiesWOOSTER v. COOPER et al.
CourtNew Jersey Supreme Court

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Appeal from court of chancery.

Suit by Charles I. Wooster against William T. Cooper and others. Decree for defendants, and plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

John W. Wescott and John J. Crandall, for appellant.

William Moore and James Buchanan, for respondents.

GUMMERE, J. Benjamin D. Cooper died in the month of March, 1893, having made his last will on December 31, 1881, by which, among other things, he provided as follows: "I order and direct that all my estate, real, personal, and mixed, shall during the life of my beloved wife, Tacy Cooper, should she survive me, pass into her hands, and be subject to her sole management and control, to keep and use or sell and dispose of the same as she shall see fit; and my executors hereinafter named shall not, during said time, be responsible therefor. From and after the death of my wife, should she survive me otherwise from and after my death, all my estate, real, personal, and mixed, which shall then remain, I order and direct my executors hereinafter named, or the survivor of them, to dispose of, as soon as conveniently may be thereafter, as follows." The will then directs a conversion of the estate into cash, and the distribution thereof among the respondents in this case. Testator's wife, Tacy, survived him, and, under the terms of his will, took possession and control of his entire estate, real and personal, and continued to possess and enjoy the same until her death, which occurred February 24, 1894. Testator's wife made no disposition of any portion of her husband's estate during her lifetime, but she left a will in and by which, after directing the payment of her debts and funeral expenses, she gave, bequeathed, and devised all her property, both real and personal, wherever situate and whatever the same might be, to her nephew Charles I. Wooster, the appellant in this case, to him and his heirs, forever. Under this last-mentioned will, the appellant claims to be entitled to the whole of the estate of Benjamin D. Cooper which was in the possession of his wife, Tacy, at her death; his insistment being that she was the absolute owner thereof by the terms of her husband's will, because there was coupled with the devise to her an absolute and unqualified power to dispose of the estate. The vice chancellor, by the decree appealed from, overruled this claim, and held that,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
20 cases
  • Murdoch v. Murdoch
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • December 12, 1910
    ...71 N.J.L. 331, 60 A. 357; Wiley v. Gregory, 135 Ind. 657, 35 N.E. 507; Jackson v. Robins, 16 Johns. (N. Y.) 537; Wooster v. Cooper, 53 N. J. Eq. 682, 33 A. 1050; Funk v. Eggleston, 92 Ill. 515, 34 Am. Rep. Welsh, Adm'r, v. Woodbury, Adm'r, 114 Mass. 542, 11 N.E. 762; In re Foster's Will, 76......
  • Fox v. Snow
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • December 4, 1950
    ...had been to A for life, instead of generally and indefinitely, Pratt v. Douglas, 38 N.J.Eq. 516 (E. & A. 1884); Wooster v. Cooper, 53 N.J.Eq. 682, 33 A. 1050 (E. &. A. 1895); Weaver v. Patterson, 92 N.J.Eq. 170, 111 A. 506 (Ch.1920); Trafton v. Bainbridge, supra, 125 N.J.Eq. 474, 6 A.2d 209......
  • Gaston v. Ford
    • United States
    • New Jersey Court of Chancery
    • May 18, 1926
    ...of is valid and effective. Robeson v. Shotwell, 55 N. J. Eq. 322, 36 A. 780; Pratt v. Douglas, 38 N. J. Eq. 516; Wooster v. Cooper, 53 N. J. Eq. 382, 33 A. 1050; Weaver v. Patterson, 92 N. J. Eq. 170, 111 A. 506; Duncan v. Murphy, 92 N. J. 682, 114 A. 815. See, also, Tuerk v. Schueler, 71 N......
  • Mosgrove v. Mach
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • July 14, 1938
    ... ... 540, 106 So. 412. See notes to 2 A.L.R ... 1243; 27 A.L.R. 1381; 69 A.L.R. 825; Komp v. Thomas, ... 81 N.J.Eq. 103, 85 A. 815; Wooster v. Cooper, 53 ... N.J.Eq. 682, 33 A. 1050; Smith v. Bell, 31 U.S. 68, ... 6 Pet. 68, 8 L.Ed. 322; Brant v. Virginia Coal & Iron ... Co., 93 ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT