Wooten v. Sanders, 77-3236

CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
Writing for the CourtBefore RONEY, GEE and FAY; PER CURIAM
CitationWooten v. Sanders, 572 F.2d 500 (5th Cir. 1978)
Decision Date04 May 1978
Docket NumberNo. 77-3236,77-3236
PartiesArthur M. WOOTEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kermit SANDERS, Sheriff, Cobb County, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Summary Calendar. *

George N. Sparrow, Jr., E. Wayne Wallhausen, East Point, Ga., for plaintiff-appellant.

Toby B. Prodgers, Marietta, Ga., George H. Connell, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., for Kermit Sanders.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.

Before RONEY, GEE and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

For the reasons stated therein, the order of the district court dismissing plaintiff's action as untimely was correct.

Plaintiff's action under 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1983 and 1985 alleges that defendants assaulted him and caused him bodily injury when they arrested him. State law controls the limitations period for actions under these sections. Plaintiff claims that in Georgia an action for assault is governed by a three-year common law limitations period. The district court found that the three-year common law period, if it ever existed, was no longer the law of Georgia. Rather, it found that Ga.Code Ann. § 3-1004, which provides a two-year limitations period for "actions for injuries to the person," was applicable.

Since plaintiff was arrested on May 2, 1975 and released on May 5, 1975, but did not bring this action until July 15, 1977, his action is time barred by the two-year limitations period of § 3-1004.

AFFIRMED.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
6 cases
  • Wilson v. Garcia
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • April 17, 1985
    ...Kentucky statute); and Whatley v. Department of Education, 673 F.2d 873, 877 (CA5 1982) (20-year Georgia statute), with Wooten v. Sanders, 572 F.2d 500, 501 (CA5 1978) (2-year Georgia statute). 33 For example, in Polite v. Diehl, 507 F.2d 119 (CA3 1974) (en banc), the plaintiff alleged that......
  • Sturts v. City of Philadelphia, Civ. A. No. 81-1022.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • January 6, 1982
    ...the period of limitations provided by state law must be applied. Taylor v. Mayone, 626 F.2d 247, 249 (2d Cir. 1980); Wooten v. Sanders, 572 F.2d 500, 501 (5th Cir. 1978); Eubanks v. Clarke, 434 F.Supp. 1022, 1029 (E.D.Pa. 1977); Henig v. Odorioso, 256 F.Supp. 276 (E.D.Pa.), affirmed, 385 F.......
  • Whatley v. Department of Educ.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • April 23, 1982
    ...3-1004, providing a two-year period for personal injury claims, was the most analogous limitation period. See also Wooten v. Sanders, 572 F.2d 500 (5th Cir. 1978) (Section 1983 action for assault governed by § 3-1004). The "essential nature" of appellant's claim in this case is employment d......
  • Williams v. City of Atlanta
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • July 23, 1986
    ...case. See Shank v. Spruill, 406 F.2d 756 (5th Cir.1969) (wrongful arrest case; court applied personal injury statute); Wooten v. Sanders, 572 F.2d 500 (5th Cir.1978) (excessive force in arrest case; court applied personal injury statute); Neel v. Rehberg, 577 F.2d 262 (5th Cir.1978) (prison......
  • Get Started for Free