Wooten v. United States, No. 23877.

• Court: United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
• Writing for the Court: PER CURIAM
• Citation: 380 F.2d 230
• Parties: Jimmie O. WOOTEN, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
• Docket Number: No. 23877.
• Decision Date: 06 November 1967

380 F.2d 230 (1967)

Jimmie O. WOOTEN, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 23877.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

July 6, 1967.

Certiorari Denied November 6, 1967.

Jimmie O. Wooten, pro se.

Thomas K. McWhorter, Asst. U. S. Atty., Charles L. Goodson, U. S. Atty.,

380 F.2d 231

Robert L. Smith, Asst. U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.

Before RIVES and DYER, Circuit Judges, and JOHNSON, District Judge.

Certiorari Denied November 6, 1967. See 88 S.Ct. 302.

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction under 18 U.S.C.A. § 472, for one count of passing, uttering and selling three counterfeit twenty-dollar Federal Reserve Notes to Beecher E. Bowers and Thomas E. Garner, and for a second count of possession of twenty similar banknotes. We affirm.

The sole issue presented in this appeal is whether the appellant's arrest without a warrant was illegal, so that the twenty counterfeit banknotes which were then seized and the appellant's confession made shortly thereafter were inadmissible evidence. See Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 83 S.Ct. 407, 9 L.Ed.2d 441 (1963).

The trial court denied the appellant's motion to suppress filed pursuant to Rule 41(e), F.R.Crim.P., and the banknotes and confession were admitted in evidence, following which the jury found the appellant guilty as charged.

The Government's evidence in opposition to the motion to suppress was as follows: on February 19, 1966, Bowers was arrested by Atlanta, Georgia, police for passing a counterfeit twenty-dollar bill at a "Hamburger King" establishment. Agent A. G. Vial of the United States Secret Service learned of the arrest on the next night, a Sunday, whereupon he interviewed Bowers. Bowers informed Agent Vial that he and a second person (Thomas E. Garner) had obtained the counterfeit money from a man, name unknown, who operated a store in Scottdale, Georgia, which is about fifteen miles from Atlanta. Bowers agreed to introduce Agent Vial to the man so that Vial could attempt to buy some more of the counterfeit money. The next day, when Agent Vial took Bowers to Scottdale, they went to the store. There a woman, who was later identified as the appellant's wife, informed them that the man who ran the store would be back later that day. When Vial and Bowers returned about three hours later Bowers positively identified the appellant, Wooten, as the man from whom they had obtained the counterfeit money. When Agent Vial and Bowers walked up to Wooten, Bowers "froze" and then, in violation of his instructions, he asked Wooten, "Do you have any counterfeit money?" When Wooten answered, "I don't know what you're talking about," Agent Vial identified himself to Wooten as a Secret Service agent, placed him under arrest, and advised him of his rights. Wooten had been standing in the front door of his store, and immediately after he was arrested two other Secret Service agents searched the store at Vial's request. These agents found the twenty counterfeit twenty-dollar bills in a paper sack which was taped under the store counter near the cash register.

The appellant began making his oral confession about five minutes after Agent Vial brought him into his office in Atlanta, and it was reduced to writing and sworn to immediately thereafter. Agent Vial testified that the appellant made his confession freely and voluntarily, and after having been advised fully of his rights as is required by Miranda v. State of Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). No contrary contention is now urged by the appellant.

Agent Vial explained that he had...