Worcester Nat'l Bank v. Cheney

• Decision Date: 31 January 1880
• Citation: 94 Ill. 430,1880 WL 9966
• Parties: WORCESTER NATIONAL BANKv.PRENTISS D. CHENEY.
• Court: Illinois Supreme Court

94 Ill. 430

1880 WL 9966 (Ill.)

WORCESTER NATIONAL BANK

v.PRENTISS D. CHENEY.

Supreme Court of Illinois.

January Term, 1880.

This was a motion on behalf of the unsuccessful party in this suit, the appellee, to quash a fee bill from the office of the clerk of this court in the Central Grand Division.

Messrs. ROBINSON, KNAPP & SHUTT, for the motion.

Per CURIAM:

This is a motion by the unsuccessful party to quash the fee bill in the above cause, and to have the costs retaxed. Objection is taken to but a single item, viz: the sum of $297.50, for making the transcript of the record for the Supreme Court.

It a appears the clerk of the circuit court from which this case comes no this court did not himself make the transcript, but he did permit counsel for plaintiff in error to have it prepared at the expense of their client, and when it was completed it was certified by the clerk as being correct. No fees were paid to the clerk for that part of the transcript he did not prepare, but the counsel that had it prepared made a memorandum on the margin, “transcript fee, $297.50; paid by appellants.” It seems this memorandum was on the transcript when the clerk attached his certificate, but it was not observed by him. He states distinctly he never authorized any one to make such a memorandum on the record.

Notwithstanding the transcript was not made by the clerk having the custody of the records, he adopted the work done by plaintiff in error by attaching his signature and the seal of his office to it, and as plaintiff in error paid for the labor of making the transcript, there is no reason why he may not recover the statutory fees, the same as the clerk would have been authorized to charge under the law.

But it is made to appear the sum charged for the transcript is not authorized by law. It is too high. Greene county, in which is the original record, as a matter of fact belongs with counties of the second class, as counties are classed for the purpose of fixing the fees of county and township officers, but by the act of 1872 it was erroneously classed with counties of the first class for that purpose.

Section 12, article 10 of the constitution of 1870, confers power on the General Assembly to classify counties by population into not more than three classes, and to regulate the fees of certain officers named according to class. That the legislature undertook to do by the act of 1872, and first determined that the first class should consist of...