WORZ v. Federal Communications Commission, 13996.

Decision Date15 May 1958
Docket NumberNo. 13996.,13996.
Citation257 F.2d 199,103 US App. DC 195
PartiesWORZ, Inc., Appellant, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Appellee, Mid-Florida Television Corporation, Intervenor.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit

Mr. Eliot C. Lovett, Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Mr. John H. Conlin, Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, with whom Messrs. Warren E. Baker, Gen. Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, Edgar W. Holtz, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, and Richard A. Solomon, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, were on the brief, for appellee.

Mr. Paul Dobin, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Leonard H. Marks, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for intervenor.

Before FAHY, WASHINGTON and DANAHER, Circuit Judges.

Petition for Rehearing In Banc Denied June 10, 1958.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the Federal Communications Commission, granting television Channel 9 in Orlando, Florida, to intervenor Mid-Florida Television Corporation. Appellant, the unsuccessful applicant, challenges the Commission's action. After reviewing appellant's contentions, we find no basis for disturbing the Commission's award. See Tampa Times Co. v. Federal Communications Commission, 1956, 97 U.S. App.D.C. 256, 230 F.2d 224.

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Consolidated Nine, Inc. v. FCC
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • 3 Septiembre 1968
    ...of Mid-Florida. 22 F.C.C. 1254 (1957). WORZ appealed to this court, which affirmed the Commission's conclusion. WORZ, Inc. v. FCC, 103 U.S.App. D.C. 195, 257 F.2d 199 (1958). The Supreme Court granted certiorari, but, in light of the representations by the Solicitor General, in his oppositi......
  • TV 9, INC. v. FCC
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • 6 Noviembre 1973
    ...can achieve the same "merit" point awarded the black man here. This is, as I understand the word, discrimination. 1 WORZ, Inc. v. F. C. C., 103 U.S.App.D.C. 195, 257 F.2d 199, vacated, 358 U.S. 55, 79 S.Ct. 114, 3 L.Ed.2d 48 (1958), on remand, WORZ, Inc. v. F. C. C., 106 U.S.App.D.C. 14, 26......
  • Adlung v. Gotthardt
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • 15 Mayo 1958
    ... ... The Collector's commission was allowed by the District Court and paid by the estate,1 ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT