Woznicki v. Musick
| Decision Date | 17 June 2004 |
| Citation | 94 P.3d 1243 |
| Docket Number | 03CA2505 |
| Parties | Laurence WOZNICKI, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John MUSICK and W/J Ranch, Inc., Defendants-Appellants. |
| Court | Colorado Court of Appeals |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
In re Johnson
...Our holding in Schultz is consistent with the majority of other jurisdictions that have considered this question. In Woznicki v. Musick, 94 P.3d 1243, 1246 (Colo.App.2004), the Colorado Court of Appeals reasoned appellate courts have no jurisdiction to consider the merits of an appeal in th......
-
U.S. Taekwondo Comm. v. Kukkiwon
...appeals of questions of law in civil cases), we have jurisdiction to consider appeals only from final judgments. See Woznicki v. Musick, 94 P.3d 1243, 1245 (Colo.App.2004) ; Holdridge v. Bd. of Educ., 881 P.2d 448, 450–51 (Colo.App.1994) ("[W]e have no authority to expand the appellate juri......
-
People v. Rosales, No. 03CA0077.
...defendant then asked trial court to vacate the judgment, the trial court lacked jurisdiction to vacate the judgment); Woznicki v. Musick, 94 P.3d 1243, 1246 (Colo.App.2004)(construing Molitor to apply "only to perfected appeals from final judgments" (emphasis added)). But cf. Anstine v. Chu......
-
People v. Rivera-Bottzeck
...matters that directly affect the judgment being appealed unless the appellate court has issued a remand order"). But cf. Woznicki v. Musick, 94 P.3d 1243 (Colo.App.2004) (a premature notice of appeal does not divest the trial court of jurisdiction). Any action taken by a court which lacks j......
Request a trial to view additional results