Wren v. Smith

Decision Date06 May 1969
Docket NumberNo. 27045.,27045.
Citation410 F.2d 390
PartiesCharles R. WREN, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. S. Lamont SMITH, Warden, Georgia State Prison, Defendant-Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

Charles E. Wren, Jr., pro se.

Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen. of Georgia, Mathew Robins, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dept. of Law, Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.

Before GEWIN, GOLDBERG and DYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

In this pro se case appellants have failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, F.R.A.P., and it is therefore appropriate to dispose of this case summarily pursuant to Rule 9(c) (2) of this Court. Stout v. Broom, 5 Cir. 1969, 406 F.2d 758.

The appellants are prisoners in the Georgia State Penitentiary at Reidsville who petitioned the district court for an injunction to block desegregation of prison facilities. The integration had been ordered by a three-judge district court. See Wilson et al. v. Kelley, N.D.Ga.1968, 294 F.Supp. 1005.

Injunctive relief was denied below on grounds that Wilson was a proper class action under Rule 23(b) (1), F.R. Civ.P., and appellants, being within the class designated as plaintiffs in that action, are bound by that decision. Rule 23(c) (3), F.R.Civ.P. The district court was correct in its interpretation of the rule. The judgment below is affirmed.

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • E.E.O.C. v. Children's Hosp. Medical Center of Northern California
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 8 Noviembre 1983
    ...Mississippi Medical Center, Inc., 586 F.2d 457, 461 (5th Cir.1978); Gonzales v. Cassidy, 474 F.2d 67, 74 (5th Cir.1973); Wren v. Smith, 410 F.2d 390, 391 (5th Cir.1969). See also Restatement (Second) of Judgments Sec. 41, Comment e (1982); Advisory Committee Note to 1966 amendment to Rule 2......
  • Gillespie v. Crawford
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • 2 Noviembre 1988
    ...(5th Cir.1979); Fowler v. Birmingham News Co., 608 F.2d 1055 (5th Cir.1979); Cotton v. Hutto, 577 F.2d 453 (8th Cir.1978); Wren v. Smith, 410 F.2d 390 (5th Cir.1969); see generally 7A C. Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure Sec. 1789 (1972 & Id. at 446-47. This court voted the......
  • Green v. McKaskle
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • 26 Agosto 1985
    ...(5th Cir.1979); Fowler v. Birmingham News Co., 608 F.2d 1055 (5th Cir.1979); Cotton v. Hutto, 577 F.2d 453 (8th Cir.1978); Wren v. Smith, 410 F.2d 390 (5th Cir.1969); see generally 7A C. Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure Sec. 1789 (1972 & What is said here applies to equita......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT