Wright v. Creative Corp.

Decision Date25 April 1972
Docket NumberNo. 70--694,70--694
Citation498 P.2d 1179,30 Colo.App. 575
PartiesPatrick Francis WRIGHT, a minor by and through his father and next friend, Francis E. Wright, and Francis E. Wright, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CREATIVE CORPORATION, a Colorado corporation, d/b/a Hallmark Homes Incorporated, and Milton Taylor, d/b/a Perma Construction Company, Defendants-Appellees. . II
CourtColorado Court of Appeals
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
32 cases
  • McClanahan v. American Gilsonite Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Colorado
    • 21 July 1980
    ...ruled out. Second, under Colorado law the contentions raised by Gilsonite are foreclosed by the decision in Wright v. Creative Corporation, 30 Colo.App. 575, 498 P.2d 1179 (1972). In that case, the court "By applying the MacPherson MacPherson v. Buick Motor Company, 217 N.Y. 382, 111 N.E. 1......
  • Menendez v. Paddock Pool Const. Co.
    • United States
    • Arizona Court of Appeals
    • 10 December 1991
    ...American Gilsonite Co., 494 F.Supp. 1334, 1348 (D.Colo.1980) (applying Colorado law) (crude oil refinery); Wright v. Creative Corp., 30 Colo.App. 575, 498 P.2d 1179, 1182-83 (1972) (residential house); Easterday v. Masiello, 518 So.2d 260, 261 (Fla.1988) (jail); Messier v. Association of Ap......
  • Council of Co-Owners Atlantis Condominium, Inc. v. Whiting-Turner Contracting Co.
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • 14 November 1986
    ...1051, 100 L.Ed. 1501 (1956) (tenant's action against landlord's contractor for negligent repair of railing); Wright v. Creative Corp., 30 Colo.App. 575, 498 P.2d 1179 (1972) (subsequent purchaser's action against contractor for failure to install safety glass in a sliding door); Drexel Prop......
  • Wright v. U.S.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • 15 February 1978
    ...v. Granger, 112 Ariz. 440, 543 P.2d 428, 433-34; see also Baker v. Fryar, 77 N.M. 257, 421 P.2d 784, 786-87; Wright v. Creative Corp., 30 Colo.App. 575, 498 P.2d 1179, 1181-82; Totten v. Gruzen, 52 N.J. 202, 245 A.2d 1, L. H. Bell & Associates, Inc. v. Granger, supra, is of special signific......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
21 books & journal articles
  • Chapter 14 - § 14.5 • TORT CLAIMS ARISING FROM THE CONSTRUCTION AND SALE OF A HOME
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Practitioner's Guide to Colorado Construction Law (CBA) Chapter 14 Residential Construction
    • Invalid date
    ...Howard C. Klemme, "The Enterprise Liability Theory of Torts," 47 U. Colo. L. Rev. 153, 158 (1976)).[1220] Wright v. Creative Corp., 498 P.2d 1179, 1182-83 (Colo. App. 1972).[1221] Cosmopolitan Homes, Inc. v. Weller, 663 P.2d 1041, 1045 (Colo. 1983). The authors would add the following to th......
  • Cardozo Revisited: Liability to Third Parties; a Real Property Perspective
    • United States
    • Seattle University School of Law Seattle University Law Review No. 7-02, December 1983
    • Invalid date
    ...L. Rev. 166 (1966). 156. Kriegler v. Eichler Homes, Inc., 269 Cal. App. 2d 224, 74 Cal. Rptr. 749 (1969); Wright v. Crative Corp., 30 Colo. App. 575, 498 P.2d 1179 (1972); Cooper v. Cordova Sand and Gravel, Inc., 485 S.W.2d 261 (Tenn. 1972). This was followed, as to the land itself, in Avne......
  • Chapter 14 - § 14.9 • DEFENSES COMMONLY RAISED IN RESPONSE TO CLAIMS ARISING FROM THE CONSTRUCTION AND SALE OF A HOME
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Practitioner's Guide to Colorado Construction Law (CBA) Chapter 14 Residential Construction
    • Invalid date
    ...(Colo. 1982) (holding tort rationale for product liability not easily extended to cover provision of services); Wright v. Creative Corp., 498 P.2d 1179 (Colo. App. 1972) (holding strict product liability not applicable to construction of sliding glass door in home); McClanahan v. Am. Gilson......
  • Rule 12 DEFENSES AND OBJECTIONS — WHEN AND HOW PRESENTED — BY PLEADING OR MOTION — MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON PLEADINGS.
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Colorado Rules of Civil and Appellate Procedure (CBA)
    • Invalid date
    ...by separate action for specific performance. Tripp v. Parga, 764 P.2d 369 (Colo. App. 1988). Applied in Wright v. Creative Corp., 30 Colo. App. 575, 498 P.2d 1179 (1972); Commercial Indus. Const., Inc. v. Anderson, 683 P.2d 378 (Colo. App. 1984). B. Lack of Jurisdiction. In testing the juri......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT