Wright v. Wright
Decision Date | 13 January 1995 |
Citation | 654 So.2d 542 |
Parties | Helen Ann Perkins WRIGHT v. Andrew James "Pop" WRIGHT. 1931633. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Michael L. Weathers, Florence, for appellant.
John B. Holt, Florence, for appellee.
During the pendency of their divorce, Helen Ann Perkins Wright sued her estranged husband, Andrew James "Pop" Wright, asserting various claims based on allegations that he had made threats toward her; those claims included assault, battery, the tort of outrage, and invasion of privacy. The trial court entered a summary judgment for Mr. Wright. Mrs. Wright appealed.
On a motion for summary judgment, the burden is initially on the movant to make a prima facie showing that there is no genuine issue of material fact (i.e., that there is no dispute as to any material fact) and that the movant is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Rule 56, Ala.R.Civ.P.; McClendon v. Mountain Top Indoor Flea Market, Inc., 601 So.2d 957 (Ala.1992); Elgin v. Alfa Corp., 598 So.2d 807 (Ala.1992). "The burden does not shift to the opposing party to establish a genuine issue of material fact until the moving party has made a prima facie showing that there is no such issue of material fact." McClendon, at 958; Elgin, at 810-11.
Rule 56 must be read in conjunction with the "substantial evidence rule," § 12-21-12, Ala.Code 1975, for actions filed after June 11, 1987. See Bass v. SouthTrust Bank of Baldwin County, 538 So.2d 794, 797-98 (Ala.1989). In order to defeat a defendant's properly supported motion for summary judgment, the plaintiff must present substantial evidence, i.e., "evidence of such weight and quality that fair-minded persons in the exercise of impartial judgment can reasonably infer the existence of the fact sought to be proved." West v. Founders Life Assurance Co. of Florida, 547 So.2d 870, 871 (Ala.1989). On review of a summary judgment, this Court reviews the record in a light most favorable to the nonmovant, and it must resolve all reasonable doubts against the movant. Wilma Corp. v. Fleming Foods of Alabama, Inc., 613 So.2d 359 (Ala.1993).
The Wrights were married in 1966, and they separated in 1979. Mrs. Wright testified that Mr. Wright had beat her while they were together and shortly after they had separated; the last alleged beating occurred in 1981. Their next contact after that time occurred when Mrs. Wright telephoned Mr. Wright in 1990. According to Mrs. Wright, during that telephone conversation Mr. Wright used a tone of voice that led her to believe that he "would have did something to [her]"; however, Mr. Wright took no action against her at all. Mrs. Wright had no further contact with Mr. Wright until 1992, when they were both present at a hospital to visit Mrs. Wright's daughter. Concerning this encounter, Mrs. Wright stated: The last communication between Mr. and Mrs. Wright before Mrs. Wright filed this action occurred in 1993, when Mrs. Wright telephoned Mr. Wright to arrange for him to get her daughter released from jail. According to Mrs. Wright, Mr. Wright neither said nor did anything during that conversation to upset her.
Mrs. Wright contends, however, that she is threatened by Mr. Wright because he occasionally drives by her apartment. In her affidavit she stated:
Mr. Wright admitted that he travels by Mrs. Wright's apartment on his way to a particular grocery store; according to him, her apartment is on one of only two routes from his home to that store.
Allen v. Walker, 569 So.2d 350, 351 (Ala.1990), quoting Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Hill, 25 Ala.App. 540, 542, 150 So. 709, 710, cert. denied, 227 Ala. 469, 150 So. 711 (1933), as quoted in Holcombe v. Whitaker, 294 Ala. 430, 435, 318 So.2d 289, 294 (1975). A successful assault becomes a battery, which consists of the touching of another in a hostile manner. Surrency v. Harbison, 489 So.2d 1097, 1104 (Ala.1986), citing Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. Methvin, 184 Ala. 554, 561, 63 So. 997, 1000 (1913).
The tort of outrage requires extreme and...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hardy v. Town of Hayneville, Civ.A. 99-A-86-N.
...fear of an imminent battery, coupled with the apparent present ability to effectuate the attempt, if not prevented." Wright v. Wright, 654 So.2d 542, 544 (Ala.1995). A battery "consists of the touching of another in a hostile manner." Id. (citing Surrency v. Harbison, 489 So.2d 1097 (Ala.19......
-
Rogers v. City of Selma
...if not prevented.... A successful assault becomes a battery, which consists of touching another in a hostile manner.Wright v. Wright, 654 So.2d 542, 544 (Ala.1995). The Alabama Supreme Court, however, has stated, “In making the arrest, a police officer may use reasonable force and may be he......
-
Nolin v. Town of Springville
...and ennui bearable by only the most hard-hearted; the outrage claim will be dismissed. 4. Assault and Battery. In Wright v. Wright, 654 So.2d 542, 544 (Ala.1995), the Alabama Supreme Court stated: This Court has defined "assault" as "`an intentional, unlawful offer to touch the person of an......
-
Perkins v. City Of Creola
...not prevented.’ A successful assault becomes a battery, which consists of the touching of another in a hostile manner. Wright v. Wright, 654 So.2d 542, 544 (Ala.1995). It is not clear form plaintiffs' complaint or their brief what conduct is the subject of plaintiffs' assault claim. However......