Wyche v. Alexander

CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court
CitationWyche v. Alexander, 191 S.E.2d 361, 281 N.C. 764 (N.C. 1972)
Decision Date31 August 1972
PartiesThomas WYCHE et al. v. Charles ALEXANDER, Sr., et al.

Grier, Parker, Poe, Thompson, Bernstein, Gage & Preston, for plaintiffs.

Williams, Willeford & Boger, for defendants.

Petition for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, 189 S.E.2d 608. Denied.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • Van Poole v. Messer
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • July 25, 1973
    ...Chisholm v. Hall, 255 N.C. 374, 121 S.E.2d 726 (1961); Wyche v. Alexander, 15 N.C.App. 130, 189 S.E.2d 608 (1972), cert. denied, 281 N.C. 764, 191 S.E.2d 361. Summary judgment would not, therefore, be precluded by the issue of whether a 'mobile home' is a 'trailer' within the meaning of the......
  • Murray v. Murray
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • August 1, 1978
    ...Price v. Conley, 21 N.C.App. 326, 204 S.E.2d 178 (1974); Wyche v. Alexander, 15 N.C.App. 130, 189 S.E.2d 608, Cert. denied, 281 N.C. 764, 191 S.E.2d 361 (1972). In each of the cited cases this Court held it proper to direct a verdict for the party bearing the burden of proof because his cas......
  • Looney v. Community Bible Holiness Church
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • July 16, 1991
    ...the denominational church. A.M.E. Zion Church, supra; Cf. Wyche v. Alexander, 15 N.C.App. 130, 189 S.E.2d 608, cert. denied, 281 N.C. 764, 191 S.E.2d 361 (1972) (local connectional church property deeded to trustees for denominational For the reasons stated, we therefore hold that the trial......
  • Thornton v. Thornton
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • February 5, 1980
    ...Price v. Conley, 21 N.C.App. 326, 204 S.E.2d 178 (1974); Wyche v. Alexander, 15 N.C.App. 130, 189 S.E.2d 608, Cert. denied, 281 N.C. 764, 191 S.E.2d 361 (1972). The judgment appealed from Affirmed. ROBERT M. MARTIN and WELLS, JJ., concur. ...