Wylly-gabbett Co. v. Williams
Citation | 42 So. 910,53 Fla. 872 |
Parties | WILLY-GABBETT CO. et al. v. WILLIAMS et al. |
Decision Date | 17 January 1907 |
Court | United States State Supreme Court of Florida |
Rehearing Denied Feb. 20, 1907.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Levy County; James T. Wills, Judge.
Bill by H. A. Williams and others against the Wylly-Gabbett Company and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants appeal. Reversed, with directions.
Syllabus by the Court
An insolvent debtor may in good faith mortgage the whole of his property to secure the payment of one or more bona fide debts due to preferred creditors; and such a mortgage is not void as being an assignment for the benefit of creditors attempting preferences, under the provisions of section 2307 Rev. St. 1892, if at the time it is made the debtor in good faith intended it to be only a security for the debt or debts therein provided for, and had no design or intention at the time of thereby absolutely surrendering the dominion control, and ownership over the property, or of making a general assignment for the benefit of creditors generally, or of evading or defeating the statute forbidding preferences in voluntary assignments for the benefit of creditors.
An instrument must be considered a mortgage, if, taken alone or in connection with surrounding facts, it appears to have been given as a security. The mere absence of terms of defeasance cannot determine whether it is a mortgage or not.
A clause in a mortgage, made by a corporation conducting a sawmill and lumber business, that covers all the lands machinery, live stock, timber carts, and a railroad operated in connection with such business, empowering the mortgagor to sell worn-out and damaged machinery, animals, carts, rolling stock, etc., and to replace the same with the proceeds, does not render such mortgage fraudulent or void, as it might do in the case of a mortgage of ordinary goods.
Cooper & Cooper and W. B. Young, for appellants.
A. W. Cockrell & Son and A. H. King, for appellees. The Wylly-Gabbett Company, a corporation of the state of Georgia, empowered by its charter of incorporation to engage in the manufacture and sale of lumber, and to own, buy, and sell timber and timber lands, and to construct, own, and operate sawmills and railways in connection therewith, and to mortgage its property, on the 8th day of August, 1904, executed the following instrument to George W. Owens and C. L. Heller as trustees, which was promptly filed for record and duly recorded in the office of the clerk of the circuit court of Levy county, Fla., where the property covered thereby was located:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Jackson v. Citizens' Bank & Trust Co.
...In a well-considered opinion by Mr. Justice Taylor, in the case of Wylly-Gabbett Company v. Williams (decided at the present term) 42 So. 910, this court with approval the utterances of the Supreme Court of Illinois in the case of Walker v. Ross, 150 Ill. 50, 36 N.E. 986: 'An absolute conve......
-
Brumick v. Morris
......Pittman v. Milton, 69 Fla. 304, 68 So. 658; Connor v. Connor, 59 Fla. 467, 52 So. 727; Willy-Gabbett Co. v. Williams, 53 Fla. 872, 42 So. 910; Hull v. Burr, 58 Fla. 432, 50 So. 754. If, in view of all the. circumstances, the transaction resolves itself into ......
-
Hull v. Burr
......Christie Orange Co., 37 Fla. 165, 19 So. 637; De. Bartlett v. De Wilson, 52 Fla. 497, 42 So. 189, 11 Am. &. Eng. Ann. Cas. 311; Wylly-Gabbett Co. v. Williams, . 53 Fla. 872, 42 So. 910. It is true that in the instant case. we are not called upon to deal with any questions of. evidence, ......
-
Cary & Co. v. Hyer
......Pittman. v. Milton, 68 So. 658, 69 Fla. 304; Connor v. Connor, 52 So. 727, 59 Fla. 467; Wylly-Gabbett Co. v. Williams, 42 So. 910, 53 Fla. 872; Hull v. Burr, 50 So. 754, 58 Fla. 432. If, in view of all the. circumstances, the transaction resolves ......