Wyman v. Bowens
| Decision Date | 24 February 1970 |
| Docket Number | No. 866,866 |
| Citation | Wyman v. Bowens, 397 U.S. 49, 90 S.Ct. 813, 25 L.Ed.2d 38 (1970) |
| Parties | George K. WYMAN, Commissioner of Social Services of New York v. Ossie BOWENS et al |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Asst. Atty. Gen., and Maria L. Marcus, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.
Leonard C. Koldin, for appellant in No. 874.
Sydney M. Spector and Richard A. Ellison, for appellees.
The motion of the appellees for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.The motions to affirm are granted and the judgments are affirmed.Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618, 89 S.Ct. 1322, 22 L.Ed.2d 600(1969).
THE CHIEF JUSTICE, Mr. Justice BLACK, and Mr. Justice HARLAN are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the cases set for oral argument.
*Together with No. 874, Lascaris, Commissioner of Onondaga County Department of Social Services v. Bowens, et al., on appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Silvey v. Roberts
...summarily affirming Zarate v. State Dept. of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 347 F.Supp. 1004 (S.D.Fla.1971); Wyman v. Bowens, 397 U.S. 49, 90 S.Ct. 813, 25 L.Ed. 2d 38, aff'g per curiam, Gaddis v. Wyman, 304 F.Supp. 717 (S.D.N.Y.1969); Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618, 89 S.Ct. 1322, ......
-
Hurley v. Van Lare
...was affirmed summarily by the Supreme Court. Gaddis v. Wyman, 304 F.Supp. 717 (S.D.N.Y.1969), affd. sub nom. Wyman v. Bowens, 397 U.S. 49, 90 S.Ct. 813, 25 L.Ed.2d 38 (1970); Shapiro v. Thompson, 270 F. Supp. 331 (D.Conn.1967), affd., 394 U. S. 618, 89 S.Ct. 1322, 21 L.Ed.2d 637 (1969)15; Z......
-
Hurley v. Van Lare
...28 U.S.C. §§ 2281, 2284. Cf. Gaddis v. Wyman, 304 F.Supp. 717, 720 (S.D.N.Y.1969), aff'd per curiam sub nom. Wyman v. Bowens, 397 U.S. 49, 90 S.Ct. 813, 25 L.Ed.2d 38 (1970). It is urged that the New York State "lodger" regulations (1) create an irrebuttable presumption offensive to due pro......
-
Skehan v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State College
...407 U.S. 918, 92 S.Ct. 2462, 32 L.Ed.2d 803 (1972), aff'g 347 F.Supp. 1004 (S.D.Fla.1971) (3-judge court); Wyman v. Bowens, 397 U.S. 49, 40 S.Ct. 813, 25, L.Ed.2d 38 (1970), aff'g 304 F.Supp. 717 (S.D.N.Y.1968) (3-judge court) (see order at (1968-71 transfer binder) CCH Pov.L.Rptr. P10,506)......