Wyoming v Houghton, 98184

CourtUnited States Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtScalia
Citation526 U.S. 295,143 L.Ed.2d 408,119 S.Ct. 1297
Docket Number98184
Decision Date05 April 1999
PartiesSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 119 S.Ct. 1297 143 L.Ed.2d 408184 WYOMING, PETITIONER v. SANDRA HOUGHTON ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WYOMING [

526 U.S. 295
119 S.Ct. 1297
143 L.Ed.2d 408

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

No. 98 184

WYOMING, PETITIONER
v.
SANDRA HOUGHTON

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT
OF WYOMING

April 5, 1999

Justice Scalia delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case presents the question whether police officers violate the Fourth Amendment when they search a passenger's personal belongings inside an automobile that they have probable cause to believe contains contraband.

I

In the early morning hours of July 23, 1995, a Wyoming Highway Patrol officer stopped an automobile for speeding and driving with a faulty brake light. There were three passengers in the front seat of the car: David Young (the driver), his girlfriend, and respondent. While questioning Young, the officer noticed a hypodermic syringe in Young's shirt pocket. He left the occupants under the supervision of two backup officers as he went to get gloves from his patrol car. Upon his return, he instructed Young to step out of the car and place the syringe on the hood. The officer then asked Young why he had a syringe; with refreshing candor, Young replied that he used it to take drugs.

At this point, the backup officers ordered the two female passengers out of the car and asked them for identification. Respondent falsely identified herself as "Sandra James" and stated that she did not have any identification. Meanwhile, in light of Young's admission, the officer searched the passenger compartment of the car for contraband. On the back seat, he found a purse, which respondent claimed as hers. He removed from the purse a wallet containing respondent's driver's license, identifying her properly as Sandra K. Houghton. When the officer asked her why she had lied about her name, she replied: "In case things went bad."

Continuing his search of the purse, the officer found a brown pouch and a black wallet-type container. Respondent denied that the former was hers, and claimed ignorance of how it came to be there; it was found to contain drug paraphernalia and a syringe with 60 ccs of methamphetamine. Respondent admitted ownership of the black container, which was also found to contain drug paraphernalia, and a syringe (which respondent acknowledged was hers) with 10 ccs of methamphetamine an amount insufficient to support the felony conviction at issue in this case. The officer also found fresh needle-track marks on respondent's arms. He placed her under arrest.

The State of Wyoming charged respondent with felony possession of methamphetamine in a liquid amount greater than three-tenths of a gram. See Wyo. Stat. Ann. §35 7 1031(c)(iii) (Supp. 1996). After a hearing, the trial court denied her motion to suppress all evidence obtained from the purse as the fruit of a violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. The court held that the officer had probable cause to search the car for contraband, and, by extension, any containers therein that could hold such contraband. A jury convicted respondent as charged.

The Wyoming Supreme Court, by divided vote, reversed the conviction and announced the following rule:

"Generally, once probable cause is established to search a vehicle, an officer is entitled to search all containers therein which may contain the object of the search. However, if the officer knows or should know that a container is the personal effect of a passenger who is not suspected of criminal activity, then the container is outside the scope of the search unless someone had the opportunity to conceal the contraband within the personal effect to avoid detection." 956 P.2d 363, 372 (1998).

The court held that the search of respondent's purse violated the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments because the officer "knew or should have known that the purse did not belong to the driver, but to one of the passengers," and because "there was no probable cause to search the passengers' personal effects and no reason to believe that contraband had been placed within the purse." Ibid.

II

The Fourth Amendment protects "[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures." In determining whether a particular governmental action violates this provision, we inquire first whether the action was regarded as an unlawful search or seizure under the common law when the Amendment was framed. See Wilson v. Arkansas, 514 U.S. 927, 931 (1995); California v. Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621, 624 (1991). Where that inquiry yields no answer, we must evaluate the search or seizure under traditional standards of reasonableness by assessing, on the one hand, the degree to which it intrudes upon an individual's privacy and, on the other, the degree to which it is needed for the promotion of legitimate governmental interests. See, e.g., Vernonia School Dist. 47J v. Acton, 515 U.S. 646, 652 653 (1995).

It is uncontested in the present case that the police officers had probable cause to believe there were illegal drugs in the car. Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132 (1925), similarly involved the warrantless search of a car that law enforcement officials had probable cause to believe contained contraband in that case, bootleg liquor. The Court concluded that the Framers would have regarded such a search as reasonable in light of legislation enacted by Congress from 1789 through 1799 as well as subsequent legislation from the Founding era and beyond that empowered customs officials to search any ship or vessel without a warrant if they had probable cause to believe that it contained goods subject to a duty. Id., at 150 153. See also United States v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798, 806 (1982); Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 623 624 (1886). Thus, the Court held that "contraband goods concealed and illegally transported in an automobile or other vehicle may be searched for without a warrant" where probable cause exists. Carroll, supra, at 153.

We have furthermore read the historical evidence to show that the Framers would have regarded as reasonable (if there was probable cause) the warrantless search of containers within an automobile. In Ross, supra, we upheld as reasonable the warrantless search of a paper bag and leather pouch found in the trunk of the defendant's car by officers who had probable cause to believe that the trunk contained drugs. Justice Stevens, writing for the Court, observed:

"It is noteworthy that the early legislation on which the Court relied in Carroll concerned the enforcement of laws imposing duties on imported merchandise . Presumably such merchandise was shipped then in containers of various kinds, just as it is today. Since Congress had authorized warrantless searches of vessels and beasts for imported merchandise, it is inconceivable that it intended a customs officer to obtain a warrant for every package discovered during the search; certainly Congress intended customs officers to open shipping containers when necessary and not merely to examine the exterior of cartons or boxes in which smuggled goods might be concealed. During virtually the entire history of our country whether contraband was transported in a horse-drawn carriage, a 1921 roadster, or a modern automobile it has been assumed that a lawful search of a vehicle would include a search of any container that might conceal the object of the search." Id., at 820, n. 26.

Ross summarized its holding as follows: "If probable cause...

To continue reading

Request your trial
757 practice notes
  • Doe v. Heck, No. 01-3648.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
    • April 16, 2003
    ...privacy and, on the other, the degree to which it is needed for the promotion of legitimate governmental interests." Wyoming v. Houghton, 526 U.S. 295, 299-300, 119 S.Ct. 1297, 143 L.Ed.2d 408 (1999); see also Brokaw, 235 F.3d at 1010. In doing so, we recognize that although "the underlying......
  • Commonwealth v. Alexander, No. 30 EAP 2019
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
    • December 22, 2020
    ...extends to every part of the vehicle and its contents that may conceal the object of the search); 243 A.3d 182 Wyoming v. Houghton , 526 U.S. 295, 302, 119 S.Ct. 1297, 143 L.Ed.2d 408 (1999) (holding that Ross extends to objects owned by a passenger; "Passengers, no less than drivers, posse......
  • Altman v. City of High Point, N.C., No. 02-1178.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (4th Circuit)
    • May 20, 2003
    ...Amendment was ratified, the term "effects" meant goods and moveables. Under the common law as it existed in 1791, see Wyoming v. Houghton, 526 U.S. 295, 299, 119 S.Ct. 1297, 143 L.Ed.2d 408 (1999) ("In determining whether a particular governmental action violates [the Fourth Amendment], we ......
  • State v. Hamm, No. W2016-01282-SC-R11-CD
    • United States
    • Tennessee Supreme Court
    • November 21, 2019
    ...hand, the degree to which it is needed for the promotion of legitimate governmental interests.’ " Id. at *7 (quoting Wyoming v. Houghton , 526 U.S. 295, 300, 119 S.Ct. 1297, 143 L.Ed.2d 408 (1999) ).589 S.W.3d 776 The district court reasoned that a defendant’s status as a probationer subjec......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
756 cases
  • Doe v. Heck, No. 01-3648.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
    • April 16, 2003
    ...and, on the other, the degree to which it is needed for the promotion of legitimate governmental interests." Wyoming v. Houghton, 526 U.S. 295, 299-300, 119 S.Ct. 1297, 143 L.Ed.2d 408 (1999); see also Brokaw, 235 F.3d at 1010. In doing so, we recognize that although "the underlyi......
  • Commonwealth v. Alexander, No. 30 EAP 2019
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
    • December 22, 2020
    ...extends to every part of the vehicle and its contents that may conceal the object of the search); 243 A.3d 182 Wyoming v. Houghton , 526 U.S. 295, 302, 119 S.Ct. 1297, 143 L.Ed.2d 408 (1999) (holding that Ross extends to objects owned by a passenger; "Passengers, no less than drivers, ......
  • Altman v. City of High Point, N.C., No. 02-1178.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (4th Circuit)
    • May 20, 2003
    ...was ratified, the term "effects" meant goods and moveables. Under the common law as it existed in 1791, see Wyoming v. Houghton, 526 U.S. 295, 299, 119 S.Ct. 1297, 143 L.Ed.2d 408 (1999) ("In determining whether a particular governmental action violates [the Fourth Amendment]......
  • State v. Hamm, No. W2016-01282-SC-R11-CD
    • United States
    • Tennessee Supreme Court
    • November 21, 2019
    ...the degree to which it is needed for the promotion of legitimate governmental interests.’ " Id. at *7 (quoting Wyoming v. Houghton , 526 U.S. 295, 300, 119 S.Ct. 1297, 143 L.Ed.2d 408 (1999) ).589 S.W.3d 776 The district court reasoned that a defendant’s status as a probationer subject......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • AN ARGUMENT AGAINST UNBOUNDED ARREST POWER: THE EXPRESSIVE FOURTH AMENDMENT AND PROTESTING WHILE BLACK.
    • United States
    • Michigan Law Review Vol. 120 Nbr. 8, June 2022
    • June 1, 2022
    ...(O'Connor, J., dissenting). (253.) Id. at 362-63. (254.) Id. at 363-64. (255.) Id. at 364. (256.) Id. at 365 (quoting Wyoming v. Houghton, 526 U.S. 295, 300 (257.) Id. at 365-66. (258.) See, e.g., Wayne A. Logan, Reasonableness as a Rule: A Paean to Justice O'Connor's Dissent in Atwater v. ......
  • Giving up the Ghost in the Machine: Emergency Cellphone Tracking Under 18 U.S.C.
    • United States
    • Missouri Law Review Vol. 86 Nbr. 4, September 2021
    • September 22, 2021
    ...of intrusion into the subject's privacy against the need to protect government interests advanced by the search. Wyoming v. Houghton, 526 U.S. 295, 300 (1999). Searches incident to arrest specifically weigh the defendant's significantly reduced expectation of privacy while in custody agains......
  • POLICING SUSPICION: QUALIFIED IMMUNITY AND 'CLEARLY ESTABLISHED' STANDARDS OF PROOF.
    • United States
    • Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Vol. 112 Nbr. 1, January 2022
    • January 1, 2022
    ...in THE POLITICAL HEART OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 132 (Michael Klarman, David Skeel & Carol Steiker eds., 2012). (205) Wyoming v. Houghton, 526 U.S. 295, 304 (206) United States v. Watson, 423 U.S. 411,431 (1976) (Powell, J., concurring). (207) Steagald v. United States, 451 U.S. 204, 221 (1......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT