Wyoming v. United States

Decision Date26 June 1989
Docket NumberNo. 88-309,88-309
Citation106 L.Ed.2d 342,109 S.Ct. 2994,492 U.S. 406
PartiesWYOMING, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES et al
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

certiorari to the Supreme Court of Wyoming.

Case below: Wyo., 753 P.2d 76.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment below is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Justice O'CONNOR took no part in the decision of this case.

To continue reading

Request your trial
31 cases
  • State ex rel. Martinez v. Lewis
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of New Mexico
    • May 12, 1993
    ...109 S.Ct. 863, 102 L.Ed.2d 987, and aff'd without opinion by equally divided Court sub nom. Wyoming v. United States, 492 U.S. 406, 109 S.Ct. 2994, 106 L.Ed.2d 342 (1989) [hereinafter Big Horn I ], each of which ran into hundreds of pages. The Tribe also points to the 900 pages of requested......
  • Brendale v. Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation Wilkinson v. Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation County of Yakima v. Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • June 29, 1989
    ... ... 937, 110 S.Ct. 22 ... Syllabus ...           The treaty between the United States and the Yakima Indian Nation (Yakima Nation or Tribe) provided that the Tribe would retain ... ...
  • State v. Ross
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • July 26, 1994
    ... ... and partly in another state may be tried in either state under the sixth amendment of the United States Constitution." Lane v. State, 388 So.2d 1022, 1028 (Fla.1980); 7 see also Conrad v ... ...
  • State v. U.S. Envtl. Prot. Agency
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • February 22, 2017
    ...Rights to Use Water in the Big Horn River System (Big Horn I) , 753 P.2d 76 (Wyo. 1988), aff'd sub nom. Wyoming v. United States , 492 U.S. 406, 109 S.Ct. 2994, 106 L.Ed.2d 342 (1989), overruled in part by Vaughn v. State , 962 P.2d 149 (Wyo. 1998). But Big Horn I actually tells us little a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • Conflict comes to roost! The Bureau of Reclamation and the federal Indian trust responsibility.
    • United States
    • Environmental Law Vol. 31 No. 4, September 2001
    • September 22, 2001
    ...Big Horn River (In re Big Horn River, 753 P.2d 76, 94 (Wyo. 1988), affd by an equally divided court sub. norm., Wyoming v. United States, 492 U.S. 406 (68) E.g., United States v. Adair, 478 F. Supp. 336, 345 (D. Or. 1979), aff'd, 723 F.2d 1394 (9th Cir. 1983); Colville Confederated Tribes v......
  • State Water Ownership and the Future of Groundwater Management.
    • United States
    • Yale Law Journal Vol. 131 No. 7, May 2022
    • May 1, 2022
    ...1988) (rejecting the application of Winters rights to groundwater), aff'd by an equally divided court sub nom. Wyoming v. United States, 492 U.S. 406 (1989) (per (581.) United States v. New Mexico, 438 U.S. 696,702(1978); Cappaert, 426 U.S. at 138-40; Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546, 59......
  • Groundwater Exceptionalism: the Disconnect Between Law and Science
    • United States
    • Emory University School of Law Emory Law Journal No. 71-3, 2022
    • Invalid date
    ...Adjudication of the Big Horn River Sys., 753 P.2d 76 (Wyo. 1988), aff'd by an equally divided court sub nom. Wyoming v. United States, 492 U.S. 406 (1989), abrogated by Vaughn v. State, 962 P.2d 149 (Wyo. 1998). 183. Id. at 99-100 (holding that "the reserved water rights doctrine does not e......
  • The 1997 water rights settlement between the state of Montana and the Chippewa Cree tribe of the Rocky Boy's Reservation: the role of community and of the trustee.
    • United States
    • UCLA Journal of Environmental Law & Policy Vol. 16 No. 2, December 1998
    • December 22, 1998
    ...occurs in the Report of the Special Master to the United States Supreme Court, Dec. 5, 1960, at 262. (22.) Wyoming v. United States, 492 U.S. 406, 407 (1989). Interestingly, on the opening of Justice Marshall's papers to the public by the Library of Congress, a draft majority opinion writte......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT