Yacker v. Weiner
| Decision Date | 20 May 1971 |
| Citation | 114 N.J.Super. 526,277 A.2d 417 |
| Parties | Stanley YACKER, Receiver for Mar Building, Inc., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Markus WEINER, Martin Blashinsky and Middlesex Apartments, Inc., Defendants-Appellants. |
| Court | New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division |
Reported at 109 N.J.Super. 351, 263 A.2d 188 (1970).
Barry D. Keith, Bradley Beach, for appellants (Keith, Keith & Winters, Bradley Beach, attorneys; Westor A. Winters, Bradley Beach, on the brief).
William G. Bassler, Red Bank, for respondent.
Before Judges LEWIS, MATTHEWS and MINTZ.
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Lane in his reported opinion, 109 N.J.Super. 351, 263 A.2d 188.
To continue reading
Request your trial
8 cases
-
Laborers' Local Union Nos. 472 and 172 v. Interstate Curb & Sidewalk
...v. Gordon, 3 N.J. 217, 69 A.2d 725 (1949); Yacker v. Weiner, 109 N.J.Super. 351, 263 A.2d 188 (Ch.Div.1970), aff'd o.b., 114 N.J.Super. 526, 277 A.2d 417 (App.Div.1971). If a party bound to arbitrate chooses to ignore the arbitration and await an action upon the award, it takes the risk tha......
-
Lyon v. Barrett
...253-54, 293 A.2d 682 (Ch.Div.1972); Yacker v. Weiner, 109 N.J.Super. 351, 356, 263 A.2d 188 (Ch.Div.1970), aff'd o.b., 114 N.J.Super. 526, 277 A.2d 417 (App.Div.1971). Conversely, one who accepts the benefits of incorporation must also accept the burdens that flow from the use of a corporat......
-
Neal v. Asta Funding, Inc.
... ... of fraud or injustice, courts generally will not pierce the corporate veil to impose liability on the corporate principals"); see also Yacker v ... Weiner , 263 A.2d 188, 191 (N.J. Super. Ct. Ch. Div. 1970) (holding that "[i]t is fundamental that a corporation is an entity wholly separate ... ...
-
Historic Smithville Development Co. v. Chelsea Title & Guar. Co.
...a legal entity distinct from its shareholders, Yacker v. Weiner, 109 N.J.Super. 351, 263 A.2d 188 (Ch.Div.1970), aff'd 114 N.J.Super. 526, 277 A.2d 417 (App.Div.1971), so that a change in stock ownership has no effect on the title of corporate assets. It is also a recognition of necessity. ......
Request a trial to view additional results