Yahraus v. Continental Oil Co.
| Decision Date | 15 January 1951 |
| Docket Number | No. 4-9448,4-9448 |
| Citation | Yahraus v. Continental Oil Co., 235 S.W.2d 544, 218 Ark. 182 (Ark. 1951) |
| Parties | YAHRAUS v. CONTINENTAL OIL CO. |
| Writing for the Court | PER CURIAM |
| Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
J. H. Carmichael and Josh W. McHughes, Little Rock, for appellant.
Moore, Burrow, Chowning & Mitchell, Little Rock, for appellee.
A directed verdict for the defendant was rendered May 24, 1950, during the March term of Pulaski Circuit Court. The plaintiff's motion for a new trial was overruled June 23rd and 120 days given for filing a bill of exceptions. The March term expired Sept. 24th and the September term began the following day--the fourth Monday. October 20th appellant was given an extension of 30 days for the bill of exceptions and it was filed November 14th. This extension was given after the original allowance of 120 days had expired. Appellee contends that with expiration of the time first given the trial court was without jurisdiction to make...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
2 cases
-
Meadows v. Costoff
...show that the end of the term had no effect on the power of the Court to approve the bill of exceptions; and Yahraus v. Continental Oil Co., 218 Ark. 182, 235 S.W.2d 544, was decided under the terms of the said Act No. Still, however, there remained some uncertainties in procedural requirem......
-
Crown Coach Co. v. Fort Smith Interurban Lines, 4-9303
... ... may restore such restriction, and, in determining whether this should be done, the fact that appellants, Crown Coach Company and Continental Central Lines, and their predecessors, first operated the route as certificated carriers would be a factor in the situation to be considered by the ... ...