Yamhill Elec. Co. v. City of McMinnville

Decision Date22 January 1929
Citation274 P. 118,130 Or. 309
PartiesYAMHILL ELECTRIC CO. v. CITY OF MCMINNVILLE ET AL.
CourtOregon Supreme Court

In bank.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Yamhill County; Arlie G. Walker, and Robert G. Morrow, Judges.

Suit by the Yamhill Electric Company against the City of McMinnville and others. Decree for plaintiff, and defendants appeal. Reversed.

This is a suit by which plaintiff, Yamhill Electric Company, seeks to enjoin the defendant city of McMinnville, Or., from furnishing electric power and light for profit to certain localities beyond the limits of its municipal boundaries, and particularly along a certain route and into a certain locality hereinafter mentioned.

To reproduce in full the pleadings in the case would occupy perhaps 50 pages in the Oregon reports, and in the interest of economy in space and printing the writer will attempt a brief synopsis of the contentions of the parties.

The plaintiff alleges that it is a corporation duly organized and conducting the business of furnishing electric power and light to the residents and inhabitants of said county at rates established by the rules and regulations of the Public Service Commission; that it has expended and is expending large sums of money in the development of its electric light and power system and keeping within its business as a public utility; that it has extended its system throughout the county of Yamhill except within the city of McMinnville, and through its system aforesaid, is now furnishing light and power to each and every city and town in Yamhill county except McMinnville, and furnishing light and power to the residents and inhabitants of Yamhill county not residing in any incorporated city; that by reason thereof the whole of said county, except the city of McMinnville, is, and for a long time prior hereto has been, the territory belonging to said plaintiff as a public utility for the purpose of furnishing electric power and light; that plaintiff has always been able, ready, and willing to extend its service and sell electric power and light in said county whenever necessity exists therefor and proper appropriation therefor is made, and particularly to a certain golf links, the bone of contention here.

The complaint in part is as follows:

"That at all the times herein mentioned, the above-named plaintiff was, ever since has been, and now is a public utility corporation as defined by the laws of the state of Oregon, and particularly as defined by chapter XXVII of title XXXIV, Oregon Laws, and at all times, the said plaintiff has strictly complied with all of the laws of the state of Oregon with respect to public utility corporations, and all rules and regulations lawfully promulgated by the public service commission of the state of Oregon.

"That at all the times herein mentioned, the said plaintiff has been and now is engaged in furnishing and selling electric light and power to residents and inhabitants of Yamhill County, Oregon, at rates established by the laws of the state of Oregon, and the rules and regulations of the public service commission of said state of Oregon; that the said plaintiff has expended, and is continually expending large sums of money for the development of its electric light and power systems in Yamhill County, Oregon, and in keeping with its business as a public utility, and strictly in pursuance of the statutes in such cases made and provided, has expended large sums of money in extending its system throughout the county of Yamhill, in the state of Oregon, except within the corporate limits of the city of McMinnville, Oregon, the said plaintiff through its said system as aforesaid, now furnishing light and power to each and every city and town in said county of Yamhill, and to the inhabitants thereof, excepting only the city of McMinnville, and likewise furnishing light and power to the residents and inhabitants of said county of Yamhill not residing within any incorporated city; and that by reason thereof, the whole of Yamhill County, Oregon, with the exception of the said city of McMinnville, Oregon now is and for a long time prior hereto continuously has been, the territory belonging to the said plaintiff as a public utility in the furnishing and sale of electric power and light; and that at all times herein mentioned, the above-named plaintiff was, ever since has been, and now is able, ready, and willing to expend funds for and to make such additional improvements, extensions of lines and service, and furnish and sell electric light and power wherever in the said county of Yamhill, state of Oregon and whenever a necessity therefor exists and proper application therefor is made; and particularly at all the times herein mentioned, the said plaintiff was and is able ready, and willing to extend its system lines, and service along that certain portion of the West Side Pacific Highway in Yamhill County, Oregon, leading from Lafayette in said county, through St. Joe and to the city limits of the said city of McMinnville, and to furnish and sell all needed electric light and electric power to all consumers thereof living along or in the vicinity of said highway, and that prior to the commencement of this suit, the said plaintiff duly applied to the state highway commission of the state of Oregon for a permit to place its poles and string its electric wires along said portion of said West Side Pacific Highway, for the purpose of making such additional construction, and furnishing prospective consumers of electric light and power along and in the vicinity of said portion of said West Side Pacific Highway with such electric light and power as might be needed or desired that at all the times herein mentioned, the said plaintiff has maintained and is operating, as a part of its system aforesaid, an electric power line extending along said portion of said West Side Pacific Highway for a distance of about one-half mile southwest of the corporate limits of the city of Lafayette, in said county of Yamhill, and within one-half miles of the golf links of the McMinnville golf and country club, located along said portion of said highway; and that at all times herein mentioned since the construction of said golf links, the said plaintiff was and now is ready, able, and willing to extend its said electric lines and service to and upon said golf links, and to furnish and sell such electric light and power as may be needed or desired in the operation and maintenance of said golf links, that said golf links, and all of said territory along said portion of said West Side Pacific Highway hereinabove particularly mentioned is particularly within the territory now and heretofore served by the said plaintiff as a public utility.

"That the said defendant city of McMinnville, acting by and through its agents and officers herein named as defendants and by and through said Water and Light Commission, has heretofore wrongfully and unlawfully extended its electric lines and service outside and beyond the corporate limits of said city of McMinnville, Oregon, and has wrongfully and unlawfully furnished and sold, and does continue wrongfully and unlawfully to furnish and sell electric light and power to consumers thereof outside of the said city of McMinnville, Oregon, and beyond the corporate limits of said city, and to consumers within the territory now and for a long time prior hereto served by the said plaintiff, and in direct competition with the said plaintiff, and without securing or attempting to procure a certificate of necessity therefor, as by the laws of the state of Oregon provided, and without any other authority of law so to do.

"That the said defendant city of McMinnville has heretofore constructed and since has maintained an electric line, with poles and wires, along that portion of said West Side Pacific Highway leading from the city limits of McMinnville, Oregon, northerly toward Lafayette, in Yamhill County, Oregon, for a distance of about one and one-half miles, and to the junction of the said West Side Pacific Highway and the Tualatin Valley Highway, and for a long time prior hereto, the said defendant city has furnished and sold, and continues to furnish and sell electric light and power to consumers living along said portion of said highway, without any authority of law so to do, and in unlawful violation and destructive of the lawful rights of the said plaintiff in the premises.

"That the said defendant city, and said other defendants acting for and in behalf of said city, without procuring a certificate of necessity therefor from the public service commission of the state of Oregon, and without in any manner complying with the statutes of the state of Oregon in such cases made and provided, and particularly without complying with chapter XXVIII of title XXXIV, Oregon Laws and without any authority of law whatsoever so to do, are now engaged in the digging of holes, the setting of poles, and the stringing of electric power wires along said portion of said West Side Pacific Highway commencing at the junction of said West Side Pacific Highway with said Tualatin Valley Highway, and leading toward Lafayette, in said county of Yamhill, and particularly leading to the said golf links above mentioned, and the said defendants intend to and will, unless restrained by order of this court, fully complete the construction of said electric power line along said highway and to and upon said golf links, and threaten to and will, unless restrained by order of this court, furnish and sell electric light and power to consumers thereof living along said portion of said highway, and to the owners, operators, and managers of said golf links for said golf links; and said defendants threaten to and will, unless restrained by...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Yamhill Elec. Co. v. City of McMinnville
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • September 17, 1929
    ...Court, Yamhill County; Arlie G. Walker and Robert G. Morrow, Judges. On petition for rehearing. Petition denied. For original opinion, see 274 P. 118. R. L. Conner, of McMinnville, and Jay Bowerman, Portland (Bowerman & Kavanaugh, of Portland, on the brief), for appellants. Walter L. Tooze,......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT