Yancoskie v. Delaware River Port Authority

Decision Date22 December 1977
PartiesLorraine YANCOSKIE, Administratrix of the Estate of Francis J. Yancoskie, and Jason Adam Yancoskie, by his parent and natural guardian, Lorraine Yancoskie, and Lorraine Yancoskie, in her own right, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. DELAWARE RIVER PORT AUTHORITY, Defendant-Appellant.
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division

Elliott Yampell, Haddonfield, for defendant-appellant (Yampell & Cosentino, Haddonfield, attorneys).

Leonard R. Wizmur, Mount Laurel, for plaintiffs-respondents.

Before Judges MATTHEWS, CRANE and ANTELL.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

CRANE, J. A. D.

This appeal is before us by virtue of our granting defendant's motion for leave to appeal from an order denying summary judgment. Defendant contends that the judge below should have granted summary judgment in its favor and dismissed plaintiffs' action arising out of the death of Francis J. Yancoskie while he was walking on defendant's bridge because plaintiffs have not complied with the notice requirements of the New Jersey Tort Claims Act, N.J.S.A. 59:1-1 et seq.

The trial judge held that the Delaware River Port Authority is not a public entity within the meaning of the New Jersey Tort Claims Act, N.J.S.A. 59:1-3. He therefore concluded that the notice requirement of N.J.S.A. 59:8-8 did not apply.

Defendant Authority was created under the name Delaware River Joint Commission by an agreement between the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the State of New Jersey, N.J.S.A. 32:3-1 et seq., 36 P.S. § 3503 et seq., which has been approved by the Congress of the United States. 47 Stat. 308. Its status was continued under the name Delaware River Port Authority by a supplemental agreement found in N.J.S.A. 32:3-2 et seq. and 36 P.S § 3503 et seq. Congressional approval of amendments to the compact is found in 66 Stat. 738, 66 Stat. 747, 78 Stat. 215. Specific authority "to sue and be sued" has been granted by N.J.S.A. 32:3-5(b), 36 P.S. § 3503, 66 Stat. 740. Such a grant of power operates as a waiver of any claim of immunity from suit. Petty v. Tennessee-Missouri Bridge Comm'n, 359 U.S. 275, 79 S.Ct. 785, 3 L.Ed.2d 804 (1959); Interstate Wreck. Co. v. Palisades Interstate Pk. Comm., 57 N.J. 342, 346, 273 A.2d 10 (1971); McCabe v. N. J. Turnpike Auth., 35 N.J. 26, 170 A.2d 810 (1961); Taylor v. N. J. Highway Authority, 22 N.J. 454, 126 A.2d 213 (1956).

The term "public entity" in the New Jersey Tort Claims Act is defined as including "the State, and any county, municipality, district, public authority, public agency, and any other political subdivision or public body in the State." N.J.S.A. 59:1-3. The predecessor of the Authority was characterized as "a body corporate and politic" in the legislation by which it was created. See the historical note following N.J.S.A. 32:3-2. The newly created Authority known as the Delaware River Port Authority was described in the compact as a "public corporate instrumentality of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the State of New Jersey." N.J.S.A. 32:3-2. The broad powers granted leave no room for doubt that the instrumentality created is a public authority or public agency. The nature of its functions and powers places it clearly within the class of agencies designated as public entities in N.J.S.A. 59:1-3. Its possession of power to sue and be sued does not take it out of the category of public entities subject to the provisions of the New Jersey Tort Claims Act. S. E. W. Friel Co. v. N. J. Turnpike Auth., 73 N.J. 107, 373 A.2d 364 (1977). Neither the compact nor the federal statutes evidencing congressional approval contains any provision requiring the giving of notice or limiting the time within which actions against the Authority must be commenced. Thus there is no inhibition against the application of the procedural requirements of the New Jersey Tort Claims Act. See Holmberg v. Armbrecht, ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Kronisch v. Howard Sav. Inst.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court – Appellate Division
    • August 4, 1978
    ...... People ex rel. Housing Authority of City of East St. Louis v. Hursey, 7 Ill.2d 537, 544, 131 ......
  • Eastern Paralyzed Veterans Ass'n, Inc. v. City of Camden
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New Jersey)
    • August 9, 1988
    ...of a single state, but rather a public corporate instrumentality of both New Jersey and Pennsylvania. Yancoskie v. Delaware River Port Auth., 155 N.J.Super. 1, 4, 382 A.2d 77 (1977), aff'd, 78 N.J. 321, 395 A.2d 192 (1978); see also Yancoskie v. Delaware River Port Auth., 478 Pa. 396, 387 A......
  • Gauntt Const. Company/Lott Elec. Co. v. Delaware River and Bay Authority
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court – Appellate Division
    • March 6, 1990
    ...agency of a single state, but rather a public corporate instrumentality of both New Jersey and Pennsylvania. Yancoskie v. Delaware River Port Auth., 155 N.J.Super. 1, 4 (1977), aff'd, 78 N.J. 321 (1978); see also Yancoskie v. Delaware River Port Auth., 478 Pa. 396, 387 A.2d 41 (Pa.1978) (Pe......
  • Yancoskie v. Delaware River Port Authority
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
    • April 28, 1978
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT