Yates v. Washington

Decision Date23 June 2008
Docket NumberNo. 07–10069.,07–10069.
CitationYates v. Washington, 128 S. Ct. 2964, 171 L.Ed.2d 893, 76 USLW 3673, 554 U.S. 922 (2008)
PartiesRobert YATES, petitioner, v. WASHINGTON.
CourtU.S. Supreme Court
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Case below, 161 Wash.2d 714, 168 P.3d 359.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Washington denied.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
54 cases
  • State v. Mullen
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • March 10, 2015
    ...presented, and the instructions given. State v. Yates, 161 Wash.2d 714, 774, 168 P.3d 359 (2007), cert. denied, 554 U.S. 922, 128 S.Ct. 2964, 171 L.Ed.2d 893 (2008) ; State v. Russell, 125 Wash.2d 24, 85–86, 882 P.2d 747 (1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1129, 115 S.Ct. 2004, 131 L.Ed.2d 1005 ......
  • State v. Rice
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • January 19, 2011
    ...a constitutional right to a plea bargain. State v. Yates, 161 Wash.2d 714, 741, 168 P.3d 359 (2007), cert. denied, 554 U.S. 922, 128 S.Ct. 2964, 171 L.Ed.2d 893 (2008); State v. Tracer, 155 Wash.App. 171, 190, 229 P.3d 847, review granted, 169 Wash.2d 1010, 236 P.3d 205 (2010); see Weatherf......
  • State v. Espey
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • November 4, 2014
    ...comment on the right to counsel in State v. Yates, 161 Wash.2d 714, 779, 168 P.3d 359 (2007), cert. denied, 554 U.S. 922, 128 S.Ct. 2964, 171 L.Ed.2d 893 (2008). Although the court did not hold that Yates's right to counsel had been violated, it recognized the possibility of an improper inf......
  • State v. Espey
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • November 4, 2014
    ...comment on the right to counsel in State v. Yates, 161 Wash.2d 714, 779, 168 P.3d 359 (2007), cert. denied, 554 U.S. 922, 128 S.Ct. 2964, 171 L.Ed.2d 893 (2008). Although the court did not hold that Yates's right to counsel had been violated, it recognized the possibility of an improper inf......
  • Get Started for Free
4 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • Washington State Bar Association Washington Appellate Practice Deskbook (WSBA) Table of Cases
    • Invalid date
    ...138 Wn.2d 595, 980 P.2d 1257 (1999): 11.2(2), 11.3(3)(a), 11.3(3)(b) State v. Yates, 161 Wn.2d 714, 168 P.3d 359 (2007), cert. denied, 554 U.S. 922 (2008): 12.8(3), 12.8(13) State v. Young, 87 Wn.2d 129, 550 P.2d 1 (1976): 11.7(9)(b) State v. Young, 48 Wn. App. 406, 739 P.2d 1170 (1987): 11......
  • Chapter §47.6 Analysis
    • United States
    • Invalid date
    ...the trial court. State v. Davis, 141 Wn.2d 798, 825, 10 P.3d 977 (2000); State v. Yates, 161 Wn.2d 714, 168P.3d359 (2007), cert, denied, 554 U.S. 922 (2008). A trial court's ruling regarding the scope of voir dire may not be disturbed on appeal absent both an abuse of discretion and a showi......
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • Washington State Bar Association Washington Civil Procedure Deskbook (WSBA) Table of Cases
    • Invalid date
    ...(2007): 43.7 State v. Wood, 68 Wn.2d 303, 412 P.2d 779 (1966): 52.6(9) State v. Yates, 161 Wn.2d 714, 168 P.3d 359 (2007), cert. denied, 554 U.S. 922 (2008): 47.6(1), 47.6(5)(g) State v. Ziegler, 114 Wn.2d 533, 789 P.2d 79 (1990): 51.7(7) State Bank of Wilbur v. Wilbur Mission Church, 44 Wn......
  • § 12.8 Standard of Review Applied to Specific Rulings: Criminal Cases
    • United States
    • Washington State Bar Association Washington Appellate Practice Deskbook (WSBA) Chapter 12 Standard of Review
    • Invalid date
    ...of discretion, and the defendant must show substantial prejudice. State v. Yates, 161 Wn.2d 714, 747, 168 P.3d 359 (2007), cert. denied, 554 U.S. 922 (2008); State v. Brady, 116 Wn. App. 143, 146-47, 64 P.3d 1258 (2003), review denied, 150 Wn.2d 1035 (2004). A Batson challenge to the prosec......