Yazdchi v. I.N.S.

Decision Date25 July 1989
Docket NumberNo. 89-4078,89-4078
Citation878 F.2d 166
PartiesAli YAZDCHI, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. Summary Calendar.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

Peter D. Williamson, Houston, Tex., for petitioner.

Richard Thornburgh, Atty. Gen., Alice M. Smith, Richard Evans, Robert L. Bombough, Civ.Div., Washington, D.C., for respondent.

John B.Z. Caplinger, Dist. Director, I.N.S., New Orleans, La., and Ronald G Parra, Director, Houston, Tex., for other interested parties.

Petition for Review of an Order of the Immigration and Naturalization Service.

Before GEE, WILLIAMS, and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Yazdchi, ordered to be deported because of convictions for two petty property crimes involving moral turpitude, appeals. His point for reversal is that these convictions were entered on pleas of nolo contendere, citing to us such authorities as United States v. Morrow, 537 F.2d 120 (5th Cir.1976). Morrow holds that a plea of nolo contendere, being a mere statement of unwillingness to contest a charge, is not an admission for impeachment purposes or to show knowledge or intent as is a guilty plea.

This is nothing to our present purposes, however. These regard the fact of convictions, not the manner in which they were arrived at. 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1251(a)(4). For Yazdchi's point to be valid, it would be necessary for us to determine that a conviction on such a plea is not a conviction at all. That is not so. Qureshi v. INS, 519 F.2d 1174 (5th Cir.1975). See, also, Noell v. Bensinger, 586 F.2d 554 (5th Cir.1978).

Yazdchi adds a complaint that in ruling as they did the immigration authorities disregarded the Texas statute on the effect of a nolo plea. That statute, Article 27.02(5), Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, provides in part that:

The legal effect of plea of nolo contendere shall be the same as that of a plea of guilty, but the plea may not be used against the defendant as an admission in any civil suit based upon or growing out of the act upon which the criminal prosecution is based; ....

Nor does this avail him. As Qureshi observes, the consequences which a state chooses to attach to a conviction in its courts for purposes of its own law are for it to say; but they cannot control the consequences to be given it in a deportation proceeding--a function of federal law. Qureshi, 519 at 1176. Nor is such a proceeding one "based upon or growing out of the act upon which the criminal prosecution...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Franklin v. I.N.S.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • February 12, 1996
    ...under its own laws cannot control the consequences given to the conviction in a federal deportation proceeding. Yazdchi v. INS, 878 F.2d 166, 167 (5th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 978, 110 S.Ct. 505, 107 L.Ed.2d 507 (1989). Contrary to Franklin's view, we do not examine the fa......
  • In re Punu
    • United States
    • U.S. DOJ Board of Immigration Appeals
    • August 18, 1998
    ...that federal law governs the application of Congressional statutes in the absence of a plain language to the contrary"); Yazdchi v. INS, 878 F.2d 166, 167 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 978 (1989); cf. Matter of L-G-, 21 I&N Dec. 89 (BIA 1995) (regarding the federal standard for determi......
  • Molina v. I.N.S.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit
    • December 4, 1992
    ...immigration law word "conviction" requires "finality" despite state law precedent suggesting the contrary); see also Yazdchi v. INS, 878 F.2d 166, 167 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 978, 110 S.Ct. 505, 107 L.Ed.2d 507 (1989) (definition of the word "conviction" primarily a matter of fed......
  • In re Luviano-Rodriguez
    • United States
    • U.S. DOJ Board of Immigration Appeals
    • February 29, 1996
    ...(1995); Paredes-Urrestarazu v. United States INS, 36 F.3d 801 (9th Cir. 1994); Molina v. INS, 981 F.2d 14 (1st Cir. 1992); Yazdchi v. INS, 878 F.2d 166 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 978 In regard to the specific issue now before us, the Fifth Circuit has affirmed a decision of this Boa......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT