Yong v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Decision Date19 June 1972
Docket NumberNo. 71-2184.,71-2184.
Citation459 F.2d 1004
PartiesMargarita Montejo YONG, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

Joseph S. Hertogs, of Jackson & Hertogs, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.

James L. Browning, Jr., U. S. Atty., William B. Spohn, Asst. U. S. Atty., Stephen M. Suffin, Sp. Asst. U. S. Atty., Richard L. Williams, Dist. Dir., I.N.S., San Francisco, Cal., Will Wilson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Crim. Div., Washington, D. C., Joseph Surreck, Reg. Counsel, I.N.S., San Pedro, Cal., for respondent.

Before DUNIWAY, HUFSTEDLER and CHOY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing her appeal from a decision of the special inquiry officer denying her application for suspension of deportation, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1254.

In rejecting her application the Board and the special inquiry officer relied on Matter of Lee (B.I.A.1966) 11 I & N. Dec. 649. After the decisions had been rendered, this court overruled Matter of Lee in Asimakopoulos v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (9th Cir. 1971) 445 F.2d 1362.

The erroneous application of Matter of Lee, alone would require reversal. In addition, however, we find error in the special inquiry officer's determination that the sole basis of petitioner's hardship claim was economic. It is undisputed that deportation would separate petitioner from her husband who is lawfully within the United States as a student. Separation from one's spouse entails substantially more than economic hardship.

The order is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the views herein expressed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Wang v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • June 4, 1980
    ...family members in the United States, see Choe v. INS, 597 F.2d at 170; Urbano de Malaluan v. INS, 597 F.2d at 593-95; Yong v. INS, 459 F.2d 1004, 1005 (9th Cir. 1972); and the difficulty of adjusting to a new country, see Choe v. INS, 597 F.2d at 170; Urbano de Malaluan v. INS, 577 F.2d at ......
  • Diaz-Salazar v. I.N.S.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit
    • March 1, 1983
    ...stated that separation from family alone may establish extreme hardship. Urbano de Malaluan v. INS, 577 F.2d at 593-94; Yong v. INS, 459 F.2d 1004, 1005 (9th Cir.1972); see Bastidas v. INS, 609 F.2d 101, 104-05 (3rd In Wright v. INS, 673 F.2d 153, 158 (6th Cir.1982), the court not only gran......
  • Lee v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • March 24, 1977
    ...Section 106 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1105a to reopen proceedings. Discussion In Yong v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 459 F.2d 1004 (9th Cir. 1972) the court reversed an order denying petitioner's application for suspension of deportation pursuant to 8 U.......
  • Villena v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • June 4, 1980
    ...from family may establish extreme hardship. See Urbano de Malaluan v. INS, 577 F.2d 589, 593-94 (9th Cir. 1978); Yong v. INS, 459 F.2d 1004, 1005 (9th Cir. 1972). At the time of his application Villena had only one brother in the United States; most of his family was in the Philippines. Thu......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT