Younan v. Equifax Inc.
Citation | 169 Cal.Rptr. 478,111 Cal.App.3d 498 |
Parties | Michael R. YOUNAN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. EQUIFAX INC., a corporation, and William A. Black, Defendants and Respondents. Civ. 58796. |
Decision Date | 30 October 1980 |
Court | California Court of Appeals |
Cosgrove, Cramer, Rindge & Barnum, J. D. Barnum, L. P. McElhaney, Los Angeles, for defendants and respondents.
Appellant Michael R. Younan (hereinafter referred to as plaintiff), appeals from an order of the superior court dismissing four of his alleged causes of action as to the defendants Equifax Inc. and William A. Black, respondents herein (hereinafter referred to as Equifax and Black) 1 following orders sustaining the demurrers of Equifax and Black to the third, fourth, fifth and sixth causes of action of plaintiff's third amended complaint without leave to amend.
Plaintiff's suit against defendants 2 arose from a denial of plaintiff's claim under an insurance contract providing benefits in event of "Permanent Total Disability" from accidental "injury."
Generally, plaintiff alleges that defendants set up a "medical examination" of plaintiff, which was by agreement among defendants, predetermined to provide defendant American Home Assurance Company (hereinafter referred to as American Home) with a false report thereby providing that defendant with a false but plausible sounding excuse to deny plaintiff's claim for disability benefits.
The third amended complaint designates the following causes of action and parties thereto: 1. First cause of action: "Bad Faith" (naming defendant American Home only). 2. Second cause of action: "Breach of Contract" (naming defendant American Home only). Third cause of action: "Conspiracy to defraud" (naming all defendants). 4. Fourth cause of action: "Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress" (naming all defendants). 5. Fifth cause of action: "Fraud" (naming defendants Equifax and Black only). 6. Sixth cause of action: "Constructive Fraud" (naming defendants Equifax and Black only). 7. Seventh cause of action: "Fraud" (naming defendant Packer only). 8. Eighth cause of action: "Constructive Fraud" (naming defendant Packer only). 9. Ninth cause of action: "Negligence" (naming defendant Packer only).
Plaintiff made no request below for permission to amend the third amended complaint; rather plaintiff's appeal urges that the third amended complaint, as framed, sets forth facts sufficient to state each cause of action alleged therein.
So far as pertinent to this appeal the facts alleged by plaintiff in his third amended complaint are summarized as follows:
A. THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION ("Conspiring to Defraud.")
The insurer American Home originated a scheme and plan to wrongly deny plaintiff's insurance claim. Defendants Equifax and Black conspired with American Home, and agreed to locate and persuade the defendant Dr. Jordan Packer (hereinafter referred to as Packer) to examine plaintiff and prepare a false report which provided American Home a false but plausible sounding excuse to deny plaintiff's claim for disability benefits.
Equifax and Black advised plaintiff that he was to submit to a medical examination. Plaintiff expected to receive a physical examination (but, instead) was referred to several psychological clinicians (none of whom were medical doctors) where each conducted various psychological tests 3 upon plaintiff. In his report thereon, Packer (a licensed psychologist) omitted certain of the results of said tests.
Shortly after receipt of Packer's false report, American Home denied plaintiff's claim for disability benefits. 4B. FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION (intentional infliction of emotional distress).
C. THE FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION (fraud).
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Lopez v. GMAC Mortg.
......1 The DOT names ETS as trustee and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. ("MERS") as beneficiary, acting solely as nominee for lender GMAC. On August 28, ... on the existence of a fiduciary relationship of some kind, and this must be alleged." Younan v. Equifax Inc., 111 Cal.App.3d 498, 516-517,169 Cal.Rptr. 478 (1980). "It is essential to the ......
-
Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.
...... VA-145E electron tubes--custom-made products manufactured only by defendant Varian Associates Inc. (Varian). With Litton's approval, Applied ordered from Varian 11 VA-145E tubes at a price of ... To illustrate the point, we referred with approval to Younan v. Equifax Inc. (1980) 111 Cal.App.3d 498, 169 Cal.Rptr. 478. In Younan, plaintiff alleged a ......
-
City of Atascadero v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
......1107, 3 Cal.Rptr.2d 236; Lacher v. Superior Court, supra, 230 Cal.App.3d at pp. 1046-1047, 281 Cal.Rptr. 640; Younan v. Equifax, Inc. (1980) 111 Cal.App.3d 498, 508-514, 169 Cal.Rptr. 478.) In light of the bankruptcy court's orders adopting the stipulations ......
-
Bankers Life and Cas. Co. v. Crenshaw
....... Bankers Life employed Equifax, Inc., an investigating agency, to investigate the claim. The agency interviewed Steven Frye, ... 12 To be sure there must be limits on such a rule, see Younan v. Equifax, Inc., 111 Cal.App.3d 498, 169 Cal.Rptr. 478, 487 (1980); Little v. Stuyvesant Life ......