Young v. Harvey
| Decision Date | 07 June 1861 |
| Citation | Young v. Harvey, 16 Ind. 314 (Ind. 1861) |
| Parties | Young v. Harvey |
| Court | Indiana Supreme Court |
A Petition for Rehearing Was Overruled in This Case
APPEAL from the Marion Common Pleas.
The judgment is reversed, with costs. Cause remanded for another trial.
J. W Gordon and J. A. Beale, for the appellant.
G. K Perrin, for the appellee.
Young sued Harvey for the value of a horse alleged to have been killed through the negligence of the latter. The facts in the case are as follows:
Harvey, the defendant, commenced digging a well upon a lot owned by him. He sunk it to the depth of six feet, being forty-two inches across, and then abandoned it. It was located in an uninclosed lot, near the line of a street, in a suburb of Indianapolis, but without the corporate limits. It remained a long time in this condition, except that it was sometimes partially covered over with loose boards, never entirely, and most of the time not at all. The hole, or pit was useless. The city of Indianapolis, in a suburb of which the well was, contained 25,000 inhabitants, a very large number of whom were in the habit, or custom, of keeping cows, horses, and hogs, and permitting them to graze, especially during the day, upon the public commons; of which there was a great extent, and almost always covered with the kind of animals above mentioned, in the vicinity of the lot on which the hole in question was dug, and of which commons said lot formed a part. Children sported and adults promenaded on said commons. The county board of Marion county, in which is Indianapolis and its suburbs, had authorized the running at large on the public commons of all animals, except certain stud horses and jack asses. The order of the board was admitted in evidence without objection. On a certain day the gelding of the plaintiff, while grazing on said commons, fell into said hole, so made as the commencement of a...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Neal v. Home Builders, Inc.
...Ind.App. 134, 82 N.E.2d 266. To illustrate the untenable position in which the law is placed by the majority opinion, I cite Young v. Harvey, 1861, 16 Ind. 314, in which this court held that one who dug a well six feet deep and forty-two inches in diameter on an unenclosed lot owned by him,......
-
Edgington v. The Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern R. Co.
...45 Am. St. Rep. 114); Siddal v. Jansen, 168 Ill. 43 (48 N.E. 191, 39 L. R. A. 112); Coppner v. Pennsylvania Co., 12 Bradw. 600; Young v. Harvey, 16 Ind. 314; Railroad Co. Pitzer, 109 Ind. 179 (10 N.E. 70, 58 Am. Rep. 387); Bramson's Adm'r v. Labrot, 81 Ky. 638 (50 Am. Rep. 193); Railroad Co......
-
Edgington v. Burlington, C. R. & N. Ry. Co.
...206, 45 Am. St. Rep. 114;Siddal v. Jansen, 168 Ill. 43, 48 N. E. 191, 39 L. R. A. 112;Coppner v. Pennsylvania Co., 12 Bradw. 600;Young v. Harvey, 16 Ind. 314; Railroad Co. v. Pitzer, 109 Ind. 183, 10 N. E. 70, 58 Am. Rep. 387;Bramson's Adm'r v. Labrot, 81 Ky. 638, 50 Am. Rep. 193; Railroad ......
-
Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Means
...failure to use such care. Penso v. McCormick, supra, 125 Ind. pages 119-123, 25 N. E. 156, 9 L. R. A. 313, 21 Am. St. Rep. 211;Young v. Harvey, 16 Ind. 314, 315;Durham v. Musselman, 2 Blackf. 96, 18 Am. Dec. 133;Graves v. Thomas, 95 Ind. 361, 48 Am. Rep. 727. It does not follow from what we......