Young v. State ex rel. Russell
Decision Date | 24 May 1951 |
Docket Number | 8 Div. 564 |
Citation | 256 Ala. 84,53 So.2d 350 |
Parties | YOUNG v. STATE ex rel. RUSSELL. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
S. A. Lynne, Decatur, for appellant.
Julian Harris and Norman W. Harris, Decatur, A. A. Carmichael, Atty. Gen., and Gardner F. Goodwyn, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., amici curiae, for appellee.
This is an action in the nature of a quo warranto, Title 7, § 1136, Code 1940, instituted in the name of the State on relation of G. M. Russell against James Edgar Young, charging him with usurping, intruding and unlawfully holding and exercising the functions and duties of the office of member of the County Board of Equalization of Morgan County, Alabama.
The complaint as amended followed substantially the statute and the demurrer thereto was properly overruled. Sharp v. State ex rel. Elliott, 217 Ala. 265, 115 So. 392; Hale v. State ex rel. Algee, 237 Ala. 191, 186 So. 163.
The defendant filed several pleas. The first two pleas are a general denial of the allegations of the information. Defendant also filed his plea '3' in an effort to conform to the rule announced by this court in Sharp v. State ex rel. Elliott, supra, which states that respondent's answer must allege the facts which are necessary to show that he lawfully holds the office and rightfully exercises its duties and powers.
This plea as amended from time to time sought to allege that the respondent was holding his office pursuant to Title 51, §§ 89 and 91, Code 1940. Section 89, Title 51, Code 1940, as amended reads in part as follows:
Section 91, Title 51, Code 1940, dealing with how vacancies shall be filled reads as follows:
Plea '3' as finally amended states substantially the following: that in August, 1947, the Morgan County Board of Education submitted a list of three means to the Commissioner of Revenue. That list contained the names of Phil M. Orr, G. M. Russell and Eugene E. Graves. It appears that the commissioner rejected said nominees as a whole and so notified the Board of Education. It does not appear, however, that the Board of Education furnished the commissioner, at that time, with any additional list. But it does appear that E. E. Graves was subsequently appointed and served as a member of the Board of Equalization of Morgan County. It also is alleged that Phil M. Orr was appointed as a member of the Board of Equalization but that his name was selected by the Commissioner of Revenue from the list of three persons submitted by the governing body of Morgan County, and that only one name remained on the original list as submitted by the Board of Education in August 1947. That on February 28, 1950, the Commissioner of Revenue advised the Board of Education that its list of nominees had been reduced to one name, and requested the board to nominate two other persons, from which nominees the Commissioner might choose a successor to E. E. Graves who had resigned. That the Board of Education submitted the names of one B. E. Braswell and this defendant and that subsequently this defendant was appointed by the Commissioner of Revenue, to the Board of Equalization.
Many grounds of demurrer were interposed to plea '3' and raised the question that the Commissioner of Revenue was without authority under Title 51, § 91, Code 1940, to call for additional nominees so long as there remained a qualified person on the list of nominees as originally submitted by the Board of Education and that the Board of Education was without authority to submit additional nominees for the same reason.
Appellant earnestly insists that there was error in the trial court order sustaining demurrer to plea '3' and that it was the legislative intent that the Commissioner of Revenue in making appointments to the boards of equalization always have a choice of three...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. Smith v. Deason
...of a public office the burden of coming forward with some affirmative defense devolves upon respondent. * * *' Young v. State ex rel. Russell, 256 Ala. 84, 53 So.2d 350, 353. To state the proposition otherwise, where the respondent admits that he is holding the office and exercising its pow......