Young v. State

Decision Date21 October 2011
Docket NumberNo. 5D10–2450.,5D10–2450.
Citation73 So.3d 825
PartiesEric Marcell YOUNG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, C. Jeffery Arnold, Judge.James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and James R. Wulchak, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kristen L. Davenport, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the defendant's convictions for burglary of a dwelling with an assault or battery with a dangerous weapon and for carjacking with a weapon. We certify conflict with Munoz v. State, 937 So.2d 686 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006).

AFFIRMED; CONFLICT CERTIFIED.

SAWAYA, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • People v. Morales
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • January 5, 2012
    ...the reasoning of the dissent in that case. See Michael v. State, 51 So.3d 574, 575 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.2010); see also Young v. State, 73 So.3d 825 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.2011) (affirming defendant's burglary conviction and certifying conflict with Munoz ). ¶ 76 The other out-of-state cases relied o......
  • Young v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • September 19, 2013
    ...to the Fifth District Court of Appeal, which affirmed his convictions for burglary of a dwelling and carjacking. Young v. State, 73 So.3d 825 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011). The Fifth District certified conflict with Munoz v. State, 937 So.2d 686 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) on the issue of whether Florida's bu......
  • H.R. v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • February 12, 2020
    ...trial court to deny his motion under these circumstances. Id. at 165. The Fifth District affirmed the conviction. See Young v. State, 73 So. 3d 825 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011). The Florida Supreme Court approved the Fifth District's decision, and held that the fundamental error exception did not ap......
  • C.R. v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • December 1, 2011
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Crimes
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books The Florida Criminal Cases Notebook. Volume 1-2 Volume 2
    • April 30, 2021
    ...handle, those characteristics do not distinguish it from a “common pocketknife,” and the court errs in failing to dismiss. C.R. v. State, 73 So. 3d 825 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) The issue of whether an unloaded BB gun constitutes a “weapon” under a charge of possession of a weapon at a school bus......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT