Young v. State, 23594.
Decision Date | 26 February 1947 |
Docket Number | No. 23594.,23594. |
Citation | 201 S.W.2d 46 |
Parties | YOUNG v. STATE. |
Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
Appeal from Criminal District Court, Dallas County; Winter King, Judge.
Walter Crowder Young was convicted of rape of a female not his wife and under the age of 15 years, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
A. S. Baskett and Joe A. Faucett, both of Dallas, for appellant.
Ernest S. Goens, State's Atty., of Austin, for the State.
The conviction is upon an indictment charging rape of a female not his wife, who is under the age of fifteen years.The penalty assessed is death.
The appellant is a married man, was twenty-seven years of age at the time of the trial, and had one child, a girl twenty months old.He testified in his own behalf, identifying himself as the proper party, and admitting sexual intercourse with the prosecutrix on the date alleged.He testified, however, that the meeting was by previous arrangement through another girl, and that his act was with the consent of the prosecutrix.He asked for suspended sentence in case of conviction.He also detailed the movements of the parties much in keeping with that hereinafter more fully set out; his association with the other men charged in the crime, their drinking some seven to ten bottles of beer each at different places during the evening, and finally, the purchase of two pint bottles of whiskey.He denies the robbery detailed by other witnesses, and pictures his companions, together with two boys, in company with the four girls, as being engaged in a wild party of some four hours of the night.
Contrary to the statement of appellant, the state's evidence with much detail and consistency between the witnesses is summarized by the state's attorney, in his brief, in a very accurate manner which we quote as follows, omitting the names, other than the given name of each of the girls involved, as well as of their innocent companions, the two boys.
To continue reading
Request your trialUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Arnott v. State
...is an agreement manifesting itself in words or deeds by which two or more persons confederate to do an unlawful act. Young v. State, 150 Tex.Cr.R. 378, 201 S.W.2d 46. A conspiracy can be established by circumstantial evidence. Roberts v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 375 S.W.2d 303; Westfall v. State......
-
Guevara v. State
...an unlawful act." Gomez v. State, 709 S.W.2d 351, 354 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1986, pet. ref'd) (citing Young v. State, 150 Tex.Crim. 378, 201 S.W.2d 46 (Tex.Crim.App.1947)). The majority holds the trial court acted within its discretion in finding Guevara and Salinas conspired to co......
-
Hadley v. State
...light upon the motive for which the murder was committed. Drakes v. State, 505 S.W.2d 892, 894 (Tex.Cr.App.1974); Young v. State, 150 Tex.Cr.R. 378, 201 S.W.2d 46, 50 (1947). Moreover, the previous admission of the same testimonial fact without objection precludes reversible error. Boles v.......
-
Gomez v. State
...conspiracy. A conspiracy exists when two or more persons as shown by words or deeds agree to do an unlawful act. See Young v. State, 150 Tex.Cr.R. 378, 201 S.W.2d 46 (1947). It may be established by circumstantial evidence. See Price v. State, 410 S.W.2d 778 (Tex.Crim.App.1967); White supra......