Young v. State

Decision Date10 March 2014
Docket NumberNo. S14A0241.,S14A0241.
Citation755 S.E.2d 800,294 Ga. 780
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court
PartiesYOUNG v. The STATE.

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Edgar A. Callaway, Jr., Conyers, for appellant.

Madonna Marie Little, Asst.Dist. Atty., Rebecca Ashley Wright, Dist. Atty., Titus Thomas Nichols, Asst. Dist. Atty., Samuel S. Olens, Atty. Gen., Paula Khristian Smith, Sr. Asst. Atty. Gen., Patricia B. Attaway Burton, Deputy Atty. Gen., Ryan A. Kolb, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

THOMPSON, Chief Justice.

Appellant Karmbi Young was convicted of malice murder and other related crimes arising out of the shooting death of Rickey Gibson.1 He appeals from the denial of his motion for new trial in which he claimed the trial court erred by admitting evidence pertaining to a witness' identification of him shortly after the crimes and the same witness' in-court identification. Finding no error in the trial court's denial of the motion for new trial, we affirm.

1. Viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, the evidence shows that in the early morning hours of September 4, 2008, appellant and several others went to Gibson's home in two separate cars, a light colored Lincoln and a red or burgundy Camaro, with the intent to rob him. The men used bandanas and in one instance a ski mask to cover their faces, broke out a window, entered the home, and started shooting and demanding money from Gibson and his girlfriend, Alexis Yates. At one point, the intruders put a handgun in the mouth of Gibson's and Yates' three-month-old son, demanding that they give them money. Yates, trying to protect her child, stated the money was at a neighboring house and offered to take the men to it. She exited the trailer with one of the intruders, who held a gun to her head, and shortly thereafter she heard gunshots. The man walking with Yates ran away after hearing the gunshots, allowing her to run to a neighbor's house and call police. When police arrived, they found Gibson unresponsive and lying face down on the floor. Expert testimony revealed that he died from multiple gunshot wounds.

Several witnesses, including Yates, described the two vehicles used by the intruders. Based on these descriptions, police pulled over a red Camaro less than five miles from the crime scene. The car was being driven by one of appellant's co-indictees and appellant was in the passenger seat in possession of 1.8 grams of marijuana. In the vehicle, police found a bandana and a blue and yellow glove matching a glove discovered inside Gibson's home. They also found a .380 R & P hollow point bullet, the same type of bullet used by one of the gunmen. Appellant admitted to police that he was in Gibson's yard when the crimes occurred, that he talked to two men in the yard then saw them break a window and go into the home, that one of the men had an SKS rifle, and that after he heard gunshots, he and one co-indictee fled in the Camaro. Outside Gibson's home, police discovered a watch that had been taken from him, and near the scene of the shooting, they found an SKS rifle, which, it was determined upon comparison of the shells, was the same rifle used in the crimes. Following other leads, police that same morning arrested several other individuals believed to have been present during the crimes.

Yates was taken to the police department where she was asked if she could identify the individuals involved. She at that time knew from a friend that a vehicle had been stopped and she had been told by police in an unrelated statement that they were bringing some gentlemen in that they wanted her to look at. Yates viewed four individuals separately, and she identified appellant and two other individuals as having been involved in the crimes. She specifically identified a...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Austin v. Clark
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • March 10, 2014
    ... ... , and, due to the current procedural posture of this case, cannot be definitively answered.        A motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted should not be sustained unless (1) the allegations of the complaint disclose with certainty that the ... ...
  • Frost v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • June 10, 2015
    ...whether or not the trial court was referring to a jury specifically selected for this case.5 (Punctuation omitted.) Young v. State, 294 Ga. 780, 782(2), 755 S.E.2d 800 (2014), quoting Castillo v. State, 281 Ga. 579, 581(2), 642 S.E.2d 8 ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT