Young v. United States, 12780.
| Citation | 190 F.2d 558 |
| Decision Date | 28 June 1951 |
| Docket Number | No. 12780.,12780. |
| Parties | YOUNG v. UNITED STATES. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Tom B. Markley, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
J. Charles Dennis, U. S. Atty., Vaughn Evans, John F. Dore and Kenneth J. Selander, Assts., all of Seattle, Wash., for appellee.
Before HEALY and POPE, Circuit Judges, and FEE, District Judge.
The brief of Young, signed by him, is stricken because of scandalous personal attacks, squarely contradicted by the record which is on file.
For many reasons, this appeal must be dismissed. The most obvious of these are that (1) there was no order entered from which appeal could be taken, and that (2) if the opinion of the Judge denying be accepted as the order, which it should not be, the appeal was not in time. We do not consider the proceeding premature, but have thoroughly examined the record and the points made and find the sentence and judgment are not void for the reasons alleged or for any reason.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Duggins v. United States, 12908.
...186 F.2d 704; United States v. Greco, D.C.M.D. Pa., 141 F.Supp. 829; United States v. Young, D.C., 93 F.Supp. 76, 78, appeal dismissed 9 Cir., 190 F.2d 558; See United States v. Walker, D.C., 107 F. Supp. 218. If a prisoner has already served the sentence which he is attacking by a proceedi......