Yznaga Del Valle v. Harrison Et Al
Citation | 93 U.S. 233,23 L.Ed. 892 |
Parties | YZNAGA DEL VALLE v. HARRISON ET AL |
Decision Date | 01 October 1876 |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
MOTION to dismiss a writ of error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Louisiana.
Mr. Edward Janin for the defendants in error, in support of the motion.
Mr. Thomas J. Durant and Mr. C. W. Hornor for the plaintiff in error, in opposition thereto.
The judgment in this case is for less than $5,000, and was given April 9, 1875. A motion for new trial, entered and filed April 13, was overruled, after argument, May 8. The judgment as given was signed by the judge May 10, 1875.
A motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction is now made, because the matter in dispute is less than $5,000. This writ of error was issued under sect. 691 of the Revised Statutes, as amended by the act of Feb. 16, 1875 (18 Stat. 316), which provides for the re-examination in this court of all final judgments of the circuit courts rendered previous to May 1, 1875, where the matter in dispute exceeds the sum or value of $2,000, and of such as were rendered after that date where it exceeds $5,000. The only question presented by this motion is whether the judgment of the Circuit Court was 'rendered' before or after May 1, 1875. If before, we have jurisdiction; if after, we have not.
By the Code of Practice of Louisiana, 'the judge must sign all definitive or final judgments rendered by him; but he shall not do so until three judicial days have elapsed, to be computed from the day when such judgments were given.' Art. 545, Code 1870; art. 546 of former Code. This, by the operation of sect. 914 of the Revised Statutes ( ), is now by law a rule of practice for the courts of the United States within that State; and it seems, that, as early as 1828, the District Court of the United States in Louisiana had adopted it as a rule of that court. Such being the case, this court held, in Life and Fire Insurance Company of New York v. Wilson's Heirs, 8 Pet. 303, decided in 1834, that This is in accordance with the settled practice in Louisiana,...
To continue reading
Request your trial- Gilmore v. Smathers
-
Ellicott Mach. Corporation v. Vogt Bros. Mfg. Co.
... ... A ... situation at least superficially similar arose in Del ... Valle v. Harrison, 93 U.S. 233, 23 L.Ed. 892, in which ... it was held that no valid judgment existed in ... ...
-
Joy v. Godchaux
...S. 65, 23 L. Ed. 384; Camden v. Stuart, 144 U. S. 104, 12 S. Ct. 585, 36 L. Ed. 363; Herhold v. Upton, 154 U. S. 624, Appx., and 14 S. Ct. 1203, 23 L. Ed. 892. The contest is not between two parties in pari delicto. While the creditors may not be in the same category as innocent holders of ......
-
Ellicott Mach. Corporation v. Vogt Bros. Mfg. Co.
...remarked that the Code of Practice of Louisiana did require such action, and hence the decision of the Supreme Court in Yznaga v. Harrison, 93 U.S. 233-235, 23 L.Ed. 892. That requirement of the Code of Practice of apparently was overlooked by the District Court in that case with the result......