Zager v. Allstate Ins. Co.

Decision Date18 June 1968
Docket NumberNo. 2357,2357
Citation211 So.2d 744
PartiesMrs. George ZAGER, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.
CourtCourt of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US

Edwards, Edwards & Broadhurst, by Stephen A. Stefanski, Crowley, for defendants-appellants.

Gist, Methvin & Trimble, Alexandria, for defendant-appellee; DeWitt T. Methvin, Jr., Alexandria, of counsel.

Fusilier, Pucheu & Spileau, by A. Gaynor Soileau, Ville Platte, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before FRUGE , HOOD and LEAR, JJ.

HOOD, Judge.

Plaintiff, Mrs. George Zager, Jr., instituted this suit for damages for personal injuries sustained by her as the result of a motor vehicle collision. One of the automobiles involved in the collision was being driven by plaintiff's husband, and the other was being driven by Thomas Joseph Maggio. The suit was instituted against Allstate Insurance Company, the insurer of the Maggio car, and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, the insurer of the Zager automobile. Allstate filed a third party petition demanding judgment against Zager and State Farm for one-half any sums which Allstate may be condemned to pay.

The trial judge rendered judgment on the merits in favor of plaintiff and against Allstate, and he dismissed plaintiff's suit as against State Farm. Allstate has appealed.

The appellant concedes that its insured, Maggio, was negligent. It contends, however, that Zager also was negligent, that his negligence was a proximate cause of the accident and that his insurer, State Farm, is solidarily liable with Allstate for any damages which may be awarded.

The accident occurred about 5:45 p.m. on May 14, 1966, on Tate Cove Road, in the City of Ville Platte, Louisiana. This road is a blacktopped, two lane, heavily traveled thoroughfare which runs north and south. A large shopping center is located on the east side of and adjacent to this road. There is a parking lot in front of the shopping center, with three exits from the lot to Tate Cove Road. It was daylight when the cars collided, the weather was clear and visibility was good.

At the time the accident occurred Mr. and Mrs. Zager were in their family owned automobile, with Mr. Zager driving. Their car had been parked in the above mentioned parking lot, and they left the lot by means of the center or middle exit. After entering the street Mr. Zager turned to his left and proceeded to drive in a southerly direction on Tate Cove Road. When the Zager car reached a point about 60 or 70 feet south of the middle exit of the parking lot it was struck in the rear by the Maggio automobile which also was traveling in a southerly direction on that road.

The evidence shows that Zager stopped his car at the exit of the parking lot and he waited for one or two vehicles to pass the exit before he proceeded into Tate Cove Road. He acknowledges that he saw the Maggio car approaching from the north, but he stated that he thought he had sufficient time within which to execute his left turn into that road, so he proceeded into the road at a moderate speed. After entering the street and making the left turn he shifted his car into high gear, and the evidence is uncontradicted that he had attained a speed of about 15 or 20 miles per hour before the collision occurred. The accident occurred in the southbound lane of traffic.

Maggio admits that he saw the Zager car 'moving out' into Tate Cove Road before he reached the northernmost exit of the parking lot . By actual measurement, the northernmost exit is 273 feet north of the exit which was used by Mr. Zager. Maggio, therefore, was at least 273 feet from Zager when the latter entered the street ahead of him. Since the collision occurred at a point 60 or 70 feet south of the middle exit, it is apparent that Maggio traveled a distance of at least 333 or 343 feet between the time he saw the Zager car enter the street and the time the collision occurred.

The speed limit on Tate Cove Road at that point was 35 miles per hour. Maggio testified that he was driving at about that speed as he approached the parking lot, and that he applied his brakes as soon as he saw Zager enter the street but that he was unable to reduce the speed of his car enough to avoid an accident. The evidence shows that the Maggio car did not leave any skid marks on the road, and that the cars collided with considerable force in spite of the fact that they were both travelling south and the lead car was travelling about 15 or 20 miles per hour.

The trial judge concluded that Maggio was negligent in failing to reduce the speed of his automobile when he saw the Zager car ahead of him, and that his negligence was the sole proximate cause of the accident. He found that Zager was free from negligence. Since Maggio's negligence is conceded, we are concerned here only with the question of whether Zager also was negligent.

The primary duty of avoiding a collision rests upon the driver of a vehicle entering a public highway from a private driveway, such a driver being required to keep a lookout for vehicles...

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • Day v. Campbell-Grosjean Roofing & Sheet Metal Corp.
    • United States
    • Louisiana Supreme Court
    • December 13, 1971
    ...person that his entry can be made in safety and without obstructing the passage of approaching traffic. See Zager v. Allstate Insurance Co., 211 So.2d 744 (La.App.3d Cir. 1968) and decisions summarized The site of the accident was at Salter's Truck Stop on Highway 190 in West Baton Rouge Pa......
  • Arnold v. Patterson
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US
    • July 7, 1969
    ...1969; Carlisle v. Employers Mutual of Wausau, La.App., 220 So.2d 152; Harney v. Kountz, La.App., 218 So .2d 913; Zager v. Allstate Insurance Company, La.App., 211 So.2d 744; Harris v. Travelers Insurance Company, La.App., 207 So.2d 891; Morgan v. Whittington, La.App., 191 So.2d 911; Poleman......
  • Carlisle v. Employers Mutuals of Wausau, s. 3289
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US
    • March 3, 1969
    ...913, handed down on February 3, 1969. Dupuy v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co., La.App., 212 So.2d 484; Zager v. Allstate Insurance Company, La.App., 211 So.2d 744; Harris v. Travelers Insurance Company, La.App., 207 So.2d 891; Mouton v. Continental Insurance Company, La.App., 196 So......
  • Irving v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US
    • October 7, 1987
    ...whether the oncoming vehicle with the right of way was so close as to constitute an "immediate hazard". In Zager v. Allstate Insurance Company, 211 So.2d 744 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1968), this court explained the duty of a motorist entering a public highway from a private drive as follows: "The p......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT