Zamora v. State, No. 90-883

CourtCourt of Appeal of Florida (US)
Writing for the CourtPER CURIAM
Citation580 So.2d 894
PartiesRaul ZAMORA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. 580 So.2d 894, 16 Fla. L. Week. D1630
Decision Date18 June 1991
Docket NumberNo. 90-883

Page 894

580 So.2d 894
Raul ZAMORA, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 90-883.
580 So.2d 894, 16 Fla. L. Week. D1630
District Court of Appeal of Florida,
Third District.
June 18, 1991.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Alfonso Sepe, Judge.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Robert Burke, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Mark S. Dunn, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BASKIN, GERSTEN and GODERICH, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Williams v. State, 492 So.2d 1388 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Wolack v. State, 464 So.2d 587 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 476 So.2d 676 (Fla.1985).

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 practice notes
  • Martinez v. State, Nos. 94-1073
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • May 10, 1995
    ...a concealed firearm. A trial was held, a jury found Martinez guilty on all counts, and this court affirmed. See Martinez v. State, 580 So.2d 894 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). Martinez then filed a rule 3.850 motion alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Martinez has also filed a writ of ha......
1 cases
  • Martinez v. State, Nos. 94-1073
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • May 10, 1995
    ...a concealed firearm. A trial was held, a jury found Martinez guilty on all counts, and this court affirmed. See Martinez v. State, 580 So.2d 894 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). Martinez then filed a rule 3.850 motion alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Martinez has also filed a writ of ha......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT