Zapata v. Estelle, 76-4348
Decision Date | 07 December 1978 |
Docket Number | No. 76-4348,76-4348 |
Citation | 585 F.2d 750 |
Parties | Tules V. ZAPATA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. W. J. ESTELLE, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent- Appellee. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Phyllis Coci, Huntsville, Tex., Richard L. Griffin, Houston, Tex., for petitioner-appellant.
John L. Hill, Atty. Gen., Gilbert J. Pena, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Kendall, Jr., First Asst. Atty. Gen., Joe B. Dibrell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for respondent-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas.
Before BROWN, Chief Judge, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, RUBIN and VANCE, Circuit Judges.
We write briefly en banc to resolve an arguable conflict of authority in this circuit on an issue material to this case. This narrow issue is whether, once a habeas petitioner has raised a substantial, threshold doubt about his competency at the time of his trial by clear and convincing evidence, he must at the ensuing hearing prove the fact of that incompetency as well by the standard of clear and convincing evidence or merely by a preponderance?
Our 1973 opinion in Bruce v. Estelle, 483 F.2d 1031 (Bruce I ), may be read as declaring for the heavier burden, as may two more recent authorities citing and relying upon it. Lokos v. Capps, 528 F.2d 576 (5th Cir. 1976); Nathaniel v. Estelle, 493 F.2d 794 (5th Cir. 1974). Our most recent opinion on the subject, however, takes a different view.
There we said:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
US EX REL. HARRIS v. Shaw
...514 U.S. at 435, 115 S.Ct. 1555). Harris must prove his allegations of fact by a preponderance of the evidence. Zapata v. Estelle, 585 F.2d 750, 751-52 (5th Cir.1978). B. FINDINGS OF Based on the parties' submissions, the court finds the facts to be as follows: 1. A search of the records of......
-
Bundy v. Dugger
...by a preponderance of the evidence." Price v. Wainwright, 759 F.2d 1549, 1553 (11th Cir.1985) (citing Zapata v. Estelle, 585 F.2d 750, 752 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc)). Third, the standard of appellate review Before the court can meaningfully apply [the Dusky ] legal standard ... it must often......
-
Spivey v. Zant
...(5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied 429 U.S. 1053, 97 S.Ct. 767, 50 L.Ed.2d 770 (1977), overruled in part on other grounds, Zapata v. Estelle, 585 F.2d 750, 752 (5th Cir. 1978).2 Spivey's appeal brief comes perilously close to abandoning his fifth amendment argument by focusing on the sixth amend......
-
Lokos v. Capps
...for that purpose when he makes a showing by clear and convincing evidence to raise threshold doubt about his competency. Zapata v. Estelle, 585 F.2d 750 (5th Cir. 1978). B. The Procedural State procedures must be adequate to insure the right to be tried while competent. Pate v. Robinson, 38......