Zehnder v. Barber Asphalt Pav. Co.
Decision Date | 19 January 1901 |
Citation | 106 F. 103 |
Parties | ZEHNDER v. BARBER ASPHALT PAVING CO. |
Court | United States Circuit Court, District of Kentucky |
Lane & Harrison, for plaintiff.
Wm Furlong, for defendant.
The bill, in substance, alleges that by virtue of the statutes of Kentucky providing for the government of cities of the first class, and of certain ordinances of the general council, the city of Louisville, by contract with defendant, made certain specified improvements of Baxter avenue, in said city, with asphalt pavements; that the ordinances and the statutes require the cost of these improvements to be apportioned equally among the owners of the property according to the number of square feet owned by them respectively, and embraced within certain specified boundaries, but without taking into consideration any estimate of damages or benefits thereto by reason of said improvements; that assessments have been made by the proper authorities of said city, and apportionment warrants have been issued therefor against the complainant's land in the city located within the boundaries so specified, amounting to largely over $2,000 in favor of the defendant, who, under contract with the city and pursuant to the said ordinances, had constructed said improvements, and, further, that defendant, having received the apportionment warrants therefor, is about to proceed to collect the amount thereof by action against the complainant and the said property under the claim that the defendant has a lien upon complainant's said land by reason of the facts stated. The bill also avers that as the assessment and charge against complainant's land was made by the square foot only, and without any inquiry or opportunity for inquiry as to whether the said land was benefited or injured by the improvements aforesaid, he is about to be deprived of his property without due process of law, and is about to be denied in respect thereto the equal protection of the laws all in violation of the fourteenth article of amendments to the constitution of the United States. Upon these grounds the bill asks that the defendant be enjoined from enforcing said warrants and assessments, and the lien claimed thereunder against the complainant's land. As the improvements were doubtless made in good faith by the defendant, the contractor, at great expense, but without any attempt on the part of the complainant, who must have known of the progress of the work, to stop it by an appeal to the protection of the courts before it was finished, and without giving any notice to the defendant that he would resist payment when the improvement was completed, the case is one of much hardship, the stress of which the court has felt and recognized in the consideration of the case. Sections 2832-2839, inclusive, of the Kentucky Statutes, as amended in 1898, embrace the statute law of the state upon the subject. So far as is necessary to any understanding of the case before us, the provisions of the statute are as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Schmelzer v. Kansas City
... ... 419; Dietz v. City of ... Neenah, 91 Wis. 422; Zehnder v. Barber Asphalt Pav ... Co., 106 F. 103; Corcoran v. Cambridge, 199 ... ...
-
Matthews v. Kimball
...and degree of benefits, they are violative of the last clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, Const. United States. 172 U.S. 269; 106 F. 103; 103 F. 357; 91 F. 37; 94 F. 409; F. 166; 100 F. 588; 98 F. 361; 92 Tex. 685; 98 F. 849; 25 Am. & Eng. Enc. Law, 469; 61 S.W. 577. Whipple & W......
-
Zehnder v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.
...108 F. 570 ZEHNDER v. BARBER ASPHALT PAV. CO. United States Circuit Court, D. Kentucky.May 11, 1901 ... Lane & ... Harrison, for plaintiff ... Wm ... Furlong, for defendant ... EVANS, ... District Judge ... When ... the motion in this case for an injunction pendente lite was ... sustained, ... ...