Zeig v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co.
| Decision Date | 09 January 1928 |
| Docket Number | No. 101.,101. |
| Citation | 23 F.2d 665 |
| Parties | ZEIG v. MASSACHUSETTS BONDING & INS. CO. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit |
Kopp, Markewich & Null, of New York City (Samuel Null, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff in error.
Joseph L. Prager, of New York City (Fred Boehm, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant in error.
Before MANTON, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.
AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).
The defendant argues that it was necessary for the plaintiff actually to collect the full amount of the policies for $15,000, in order to "exhaust" that insurance. Such a construction of the policy sued on seems unnecessarily stringent. It is doubtless true that the parties could impose such a condition precedent to liability upon the policy, if they chose to do so. But the defendant had no rational interest in whether the insured collected the full amount of the primary policies, so long as it was only called upon to pay such portion of the loss as was in excess of the limits of those policies. To require an absolute collection of the primary insurance to its full limit would in many, if not most, cases involve delay, promote litigation, and prevent an adjustment of disputes which is both convenient and commendable. A result harmful to the insured, and of no rational advantage to the insurer, ought only to be reached when the terms of the contract demand it.
We can see no reason for a construction so burdensome to the insured. Nothing is said about the "collection" of the full amount of the primary insurance. The clause provides only that it be "exhausted in the payment of claims to the full amount of the expressed limits." The claims are paid to the full amount of the policies, if they are settled and discharged, and the primary insurance is thereby exhausted. There is no need of interpreting the word "payment" as only relating to payment in cash. It often is used as meaning the satisfaction of a claim by compromise, or in other ways. To render the policy in suit applicable, claims had to be and were satisfied and paid to the full limit of the primary policies. Only such portion of the loss as exceeded, not the cash settlement, but the limits of these policies, is covered by the excess policy.
We are aware of the fact that there are decisions holding that the words "exhausted in the payment of claims" require collection of the primary policies as a condition precedent to the right to...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Hopeman Bros., Inc. v. Cont'l Cas. Co.
...cites a single case in support of its contention that the policies permit the insured to fill the gap. In Zeig v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Co., 23 F.2d 665 (2d Cir. 1928), the court interpreted an excess policy that required the primary insurance to be "exhausted in the payment of ......
-
Sacred Heart Health Servs. v. MMIC Ins., Inc.
...Reliance Ins. Co. in Liquidation v. Chitwood , 433 F.3d 660, 664 (8th Cir. 2006) (applying Missouri law) ); Zeig v. Mass. Bonding & Ins. Co , 23 F.2d 665, 666 (2d Cir. 1928) ("The claims are paid to the full amount of the policies, if they are settled and discharged, and the primary insuran......
-
Qualcomm, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's
...251 Cal.App.2d 942, 966, 60 Cal.Rptr. 544 as well as out-of-state authorities adopting the reasoning of Zeig v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co. (2d Cir.1928) 23 F.2d 665 (Zeig), in which the court held primary insurance was exhausted and an excess carrier was liable for losses exceeding t......
-
Christiania General Ins. Corp. of New York v. Great American Ins. Co.
...reinsured and original insured that address future claims reimbursable under reinsurance contract); see also Zeig v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co., 23 F.2d 665, 666 (2d Cir.1928) (excess carrier must pay claims to extent its layer is pierced even though underlying carrier settled with in......
-
Second Circuit Limits Zeig v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Co.
...excess insurance. In doing do, the court sharply limited an influential 1928 precedent, Zeig v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Co., 23 F.2d 665 (2d Cir. 1928). Zeig, written by Judge Augustus Hand, is often cited as the leading case standing for the proposition that, if an excess pol......
-
Maximus Opinion Permits Functional Exhaustion Of Underlying Insurance
...on the "public policy favoring settlements" as articulated in the 1928 2nd Circuit case Zeig v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co., 23 F.2d 665 (2nd Cir. According to the Maximus court, Zeig had concluded that it made no practical difference to an excess insurer whether its exhaustion poi......
-
Figuring Out The Insurance Exhaustion Rule In New York Is Exhausting
...did not actually pay the losses. This view was based on the Second Circuit's decision in Zeig v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co., 23 F.2d 665 (2d Cir. 1928). The Zeig court held that the insured could settle with the primary carrier for less than the primary limits and still trigger co......
-
Second Circuit Confirms That Excess Policies Require Payment Of Losses Covered By Underlying Policies Before Excess Policies Can Be Triggered
...Id. at *6 n.15. The Second Circuit also rejected the Directors' reliance on Zeig v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Company, 23 F.2d 665 (2d Cir. 1928), a decision that broadly construed the term payment to include amounts that are compromised by settlement. In Zeig, the policyholde......