Zeligson v. Hartman-Blair, Inc.

Decision Date09 March 1942
Docket NumberNo. 2383.,2383.
Citation126 F.2d 595
PartiesZELIGSON v. HARTMAN-BLAIR, Inc., et al.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit

Roy H. Wasson, of Wichita, Kan. (Chas. L. Yancey, G. C. Spillers, and Kavanaugh Bush, all of Tulsa, Okla., on the brief), for appellant.

Robert C. Foulston, of Wichita, Kan. (George Siefkin, Carl T. Smith, and Foulston, Siefkin, Bartlett & Morris, all of Wichita, Kan., on the brief), for appellees.

Before PHILLIPS, HUXMAN, and MURRAH, Circuit Judges.

PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.

This is an action on a claim for loss of a broker's commission. Zeligson, the broker, sought to recover the alleged loss from Hartman-Blair, Inc.,1 W. L. Hartman, and H. H. Blair.

The trial court sustained a motion to dismiss the amended petition and entered an order dismissing the cause without prejudice. Zeligson has appealed.

In his first amended petition, Zeligson alleged that the owner is a corporation organized under the laws of Kansas and that Hartman and Blair are its principal stockholders; that on June 26, 1939, at Wichita, Kansas, T. A. Morgan informed Zeligson that the owner was offering for sale a certain oil and gas lease and inquired if Zeligson could secure a buyer therefor; that on June 28, 1939, Zeligson informed Morgan that he believed he could secure a buyer for the lease but would not attempt to sell it until he had received written authority to sell the lease, setting out the purchase price, terms, and conditions under which the owner was willing to sell; that thereupon, Morgan informed Hartman by telephone that Zeligson believed he could sell the lease and requested written authority to undertake the sale; that Hartman consented to provide such authority; that later on the same day, Morgan presented Zeligson "with written authority to sell" the lease, reading as follows:

"June 28, 1939 Mr. T. A. Morgan, 322 Fourth National Bank Building, Wichita, Kansas. Re Harbaugh Lease SW ¼ Section 25 — 14S — 15W Russell County, Kansas.

Dear Mr. Morgan: This is your authority to purchase the above described oil and gas lease, together with the equipment which goes with the lease, but not the miscellaneous equipment that belongs to Hartman-Blair Inc. which is used on other leases. The agreed price is on the basis of $150,000 (One Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars) cash and $150,000 (One Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars) out of one eighth of seven eights 1/8 or 7/8# of the oil. This agreement is for a period of ten days. This letter is your authority to consult Mr. Glen Harley, our Superientendent in the Russel area, who will give you all available information.

As we only own one-half of this property, one-half is all we can offer for sale, but will lend our assistance in purchasing the remaining one-half on the same basis.

Yours very truly Hartman-Blair, Inc. By H. H. Blair By W. L. Hartman."2

That Zeligson examined the writing and objected to it being addressed to Morgan and to the ten-day limitation therein;3 that Hartman stated to Morgan that the name of the person appearing in the writing would not affect the authority and that Zeligson could have an extension of time if it became necessary; that it was orally understood between the owner and Zeligson that the price stated in the writing would be the net price to the owner, and that Zeligson should obtain his commission from the purchasers.

That on July 5, 1939, Zeligson procured from Mal Greenberg, J. A. Klapper, and Phil Hellar, a written offer to purchase the lease, signed by M & L Oil Company by Mal Greenberg.4

That on July 5, 1939, Zeligson obtained a written promise from Greenberg and Klapper to pay him a commission of $7,500 when the sale and transfer of the lease were completed.

That on July 8, 1939, Zeligson, through Morgan, informed Hartman that Zeligson had procured purchasers who would pay the sum of $50,000 in cash upon consummation of the sale, $25,000 in 6 months, evidenced by a negotiable promissory note adequately secured by a mortgage on property in Kay County, Oklahoma, and $75,000 out of one-eighth of one-half of the seven-eighths working interest of the oil produced from the lease, and would deposit $10,000 earnest money in a local bank pending the approval of title, potential tests, and the preparation of transfer documents; that Hartman orally agreed to the proposed terms of sale; that on July 10, 1939, the purchasers were ready, able, and willing to deposit the $10,000 as earnest money, take the production test, and complete the sale; that Hartman requested that completion of the sale be deferred until Blair returned to Wichita, and agreed that the sale would be completed immediately upon Blair's return; that consummation of the sale was postponed from day to day at the request of Hartman and Blair until on or about September 19, 1939, when Hartman and Blair orally agreed to have the production test taken and the sale consummated on the following day; that on or about September 20, 1939, Hartman and Blair notified the purchasers that the owner would not consummate the sale.

It will be observed that Zeligson demanded from the owner written authority to sell the lease; that in response to that request, the owner furnished to Morgan the writing, and that Zeligson expressly relies upon that writing as his authority to act as...

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 cases
  • Opala v. Watt
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Oklahoma
    • May 20, 2005
    ...cases in support of this general rule. See Olpin v. Ideal Nat'l Ins. Co., 419 F.2d 1250, 1255 (10th Cir.1969); Zeligson v. Hartman-Blair, 126 F.2d 595, 596 (10th Cir.1942); Fayetteville Investors v. Commercial Builders Inc., 936 F.2d 1462, 1465 (4th Cir.1991); Ott v. Home Savings and Loan A......
  • Ryan v. Scoggin
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • May 6, 1957
    ...upon them. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. Schauffler, 303 U.S. 54, 58 S.Ct. 466, 82 L.Ed. 646; Zeligson v. Hartman-Blair, Inc., 10 Cir., 126 F.2d 595; Ogden River Water Users' Association v. Weber Basin Water Conservancy, 10 Cir., 238 F.2d In presently pertinent part, Rule of C......
  • Jacobsen v. Deseret Book Co., 01-4027.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • April 19, 2002
    ...determined by [the document's] terms rather than by the allegations of the pleader'" in the complaint) (quoting Zeligson v. Hartman-Blair, Inc., 126 F.2d 595, 597 (10th Cir.1942)). We cannot affirm the dismissal for failure to state a claim unless, after considering the complaint, Who Refus......
  • Ets Gustave Brunet, SA v. MV Nedlloyd Rosario, 87 Civ. 7296 (DNE) (SEG).
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • April 15, 1996
    ... ... and Goth Transport Inc., Defendants, ... NEW YORK EXPRESS, Third-Party Defendant ... No. 87 Civ. 7296 (DNE) (SEG) ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT